Related Experiment Videos
Variation in inpatient resource utilization and management of apparent life-threatening events
Joel S Tieder1, Charles A Cowan, Michelle M Garrison
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. joel.tieder@seattlechildrens.org
Insights
Hospital care for apparent life-threatening events (ALTEs) varies significantly nationwide, impacting patient outcomes and costs. An evidence-based standard of care is needed to improve diagnosis and management for these infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric hospital medicine
- Healthcare quality and outcomes research
Background:
- Apparent life-threatening events (ALTEs) represent a significant concern in pediatrics, with diagnostic approaches and resource utilization showing potential for variability.
- Understanding national variations in ALTE management is crucial for identifying areas of practice that may lead to suboptimal patient outcomes and increased healthcare expenditures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and report national variations in diagnostic strategies and resource utilization for infants hospitalized with conditions potentially indicative of ALTEs.
- To identify factors contributing to these variations and their impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Pediatric Health Information System to analyze data for 12,067 infants aged 3 days to 5 months admitted with ALTE-related ICD-9 codes.
- Employed multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) to assess hospital-level variations in adjusted charges, length of stay (LOS), and diagnostic studies.
- Used logistic regression to examine the association between readmission rates and discharge diagnoses/diagnostic studies.
Main Results:
- Significant hospital-based variations were observed in mean LOS, total adjusted charges, and the utilization of diagnostic studies (P < .001).
- Gastroesophageal reflux (36.9%) and lower respiratory tract infection (30.8%) were the most common discharge diagnoses.
- Increased readmission likelihood was associated with diagnoses of cardiovascular disorders (OR=1.68) and gastroesophageal reflux (OR=1.32).
Conclusions:
- Considerable hospital-based variation exists in the care of infants hospitalized for potential ALTEs, particularly in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.
- These variations may contribute to adverse clinical and financial outcomes, highlighting the need for standardized care.
- An evidence-based national standard of care and multi-institutional research are recommended to optimize ALTE diagnostic and management strategies.
Objective:
To report national variations in diagnostic approaches to apparent life-threatening events (ALTEs) and resource utilization.
Study Design:
Using the Pediatric Health Information System, we studied children who were age 3 days to 5 months at admission and were discharged with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code potentially identifiable as ALTE. Multiple analysis of variance was used to determine whether the variances in adjusted charges, length of stay (LOS), and diagnostic studies were hospital-related after controlling for other covariates. Logistic regression was used to study the association of readmission rates with discharge diagnosis and specific diagnostic studies.
Results:
The study group comprised 12,067 patients, with a mean LOS of 4.4 days (standard deviation +/- 5.6 days) and mean adjusted charges of $15,567 ($28,510) per admission. The mean in-hospital mortality rate was 0.56% (n = 68), and the rate of 30-day readmission was 2.5%. The most common discharge diagnoses were gastroesophageal reflux 36.9% (48.3%) and lower respiratory tract infection 30.8% (46.2%). Mean LOS, total adjusted charges, and use of diagnostic studies varied considerably across hospitals, and hospital-level differences were a significant contributor to the variance of these outcomes after controlling for covariates (P < .001). There was an increased likelihood of readmission for patients discharged with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 2.16) and gastroesophageal reflux (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.69) compared with other discharge diagnoses.
Conclusions:
There is considerable hospital-based variation in care for patients hospitalized for conditions potentially identifiable as ALTE, particularly in the evaluation and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, which may contribute to adverse clinical and financial outcomes. An evidence-based national standard of care for ALTE is needed, as are multi-institutional initiatives to study different diagnostic and management strategies and their effect on patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Planning Nursing Care I
Acute Respiratory Failure-III