Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on early and late right ventricular function
Tammy J Pegg1, Joseph B Selvanayagam, Theodoros D Karamitsos
1University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Insights
Off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and conventional on-pump CABG (ONCABG) similarly affect right ventricular (RV) function early after surgery, with full recovery by six months. Both surgical techniques demonstrate comparable long-term RV function outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Function Assessment
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Conventional on-pump CABG (ONCABG) may impair left ventricular function, while effects on right ventricular (RV) function remain debated.
- Assessing RV function is complex, contributing to conflicting evidence regarding surgical technique impacts.
- Off-pump CABG (OPCABG) is explored for potential benefits in preserving cardiac function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of OPCABG versus ONCABG on right ventricular (RV) function.
- To evaluate RV function changes early post-surgery and at six months.
- To determine if surgical technique influences long-term RV function recovery.
Main Methods:
- A single-center randomized pilot study involving 60 patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing CABG.
- Patients were randomized to either OPCABG or ONCABG.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) assessed RV function preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at 6 months.
Main Results:
- No significant preoperative differences in RV function between OPCABG and ONCABG groups.
- Early postoperative RV stroke volume index decreased similarly in both groups (OPCABG: 36+/-7 mL/m², ONCABG: 39+/-11 mL/m²; P=0.41).
- All RV function markers returned to baseline by 6 months, with no significant long-term differences between surgical techniques.
Conclusions:
- Right ventricular (RV) function is transiently impaired following CABG surgery, regardless of technique.
- Both OPCABG and ONCABG result in similar early postoperative RV dysfunction.
- RV function fully recovers by six months post-surgery, indicating comparable long-term outcomes for both methods.
Background:
Off-pump CABG (OPCABG) results in better preservation of left ventricular function in the perioperative period than conventional on-pump CABG (ONCABG); however, evidence is conflicting as to the effect of OPCABG and ONCABG on right ventricular (RV) function, possibly because of the complexity involved in measuring this.
Methods And Results:
In a single-center randomized pilot study, 60 patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to OPCABG or ONCABG. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imagine for assessment of RV function preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at 6 months after surgery. Fifty-one patients completed the first 2 scans, and 47 completed all 3 scans. Preoperative characteristics and RV function did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (mean+/-SD): RV stroke volume index was 49+/-10 mL/m(2) for OPCABG and 49+/-16 mL/m(2) for ONCABG. After surgery, RV stroke volume index fell to 36+/-7 mL/m(2) in the OPCABG group and 39+/-11 mL/m(2) in the ONCABG group, but this did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=0.41). All markers of RV function recovered to preoperative levels by 6 months, with no long-term difference between the surgical techniques.
Conclusions:
RV function is impaired early after surgery but recovers by 6 months. The changes were similar in both the OPCABG and ONCABG groups.
More Related Videos
05:25Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
08:49Cardiac Loading using Passive Left Atrial Pressurization and Passive Afterload for Graft Assessment
Published on: August 2, 2024