Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
Traditional Level Of Health Care System01:26

Traditional Level Of Health Care System

The levels of care describe the services provided in the healthcare system. Accordingly, there are six levels of the traditional healthcare system in the US: preventive, primary, secondary, tertiary, restorative, and continuing healthcare. A nurse must understand how the healthcare industry organizes and provides services within these levels of care.
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic calcium-potassium balancing by KCNMA1 preserves the epithelial/mesenchymal hybrid state and modulates therapy response in ovarian cancer.

Cell death discovery·2026
Same author

Impact of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism on endometrial cancer incidence: results from a large population-based cohort study.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Risk of childhood and adolescent, and young adult cancer in offspring of men with testicular cancer: A Danish nationwide study.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Incidence Trends of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma In Situ, and Keratoacanthoma By Sex, Age, and Anatomical Site.

JAMA dermatology·2026
Same author

Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Tumors among Women Diagnosed with Hypothyroidism and Hyperthyroidism: Findings from a Large Nationwide Cohort Study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

ERRATUM: Better growth outcomes in GH-deficient children treated younger than 2 years of age.

Endocrine connections·2026
Same journal

European Cancer Prevention Organization on cancer screening: an expert panel position paper.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same journal

Risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with vitamin D deficiency: a retrospective cohort study.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same journal

Recommendations for the use of CanRisk for tubo-ovarian cancer risk estimation: a focus group and Research ANd Development-modified Delphi-based study.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same journal

Sociodemographic factors predicting preference for human papillomavirus self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of opt-out and opt-in strategies.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same journal

The European Cancer Prevention Organization celebrates 45 years of advancing progress in cancer prevention.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of palliative care in managing adverse reactions in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Does educational level determine screening participation?

My von Euler-Chelpin1, Anne Helene Olsen, Sisse Njor

  • 1Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. m.euler@pubhealth.ku.dk

European Journal of Cancer Prevention : the Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
|April 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nonparticipation in mammography screening is not due to misunderstanding invitation letters. Educational level showed a U-shaped association with screening non-use, not a simple inverse relationship, even considering other breast imaging use.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Understanding factors influencing participation in organized mammography screening is crucial for public health.
  • Previous assumptions suggested that comprehension of invitation letters might be a barrier to screening uptake.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that insufficient understanding of invitation letter information contributes to nonparticipation in organized mammography screening.
  • To examine the relationship between educational level and mammography screening user patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from two Danish mammography screening programs (Copenhagen and Funen) spanning 1991-2001.
  • Linked data from the Danish Central Population Register, health authorities, Statistics Denmark, and radiology clinics.
  • Classified women into four user groups and analyzed age-adjusted relative risks (RR) of 'never use' versus 'always use' by educational level.

Main Results:

  • The study found no support for the hypothesis that lack of understanding invitation letters explains nonparticipation.
  • A U-shaped association was observed between educational level and 'never use' of screening, not an inverse relationship.
  • This U-shaped pattern persisted even after accounting for breast imaging use outside organized screening.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that factors beyond simple comprehension of invitation materials influence mammography screening participation.
  • Educational level's complex relationship with screening non-use highlights the need for multifaceted approaches to improve uptake.
  • Further research should explore other potential barriers and facilitators to organized mammography screening participation.