Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View01:14

Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View

The superior view of the cranium shows the frontal and paired parietal bones.
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View01:27

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Overview of the Skull01:08

Overview of the Skull

The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The long...
Overview of the Axial Skeleton01:09

Overview of the Axial Skeleton

The skeleton is subdivided into two major divisions—the axial skeleton and the appendicular skeleton. The axial skeleton forms the vertical, central axis of the body. It includes all of the bones of the head, neck, chest, and back. It protects the brain, spinal cord, heart, and lungs. It also serves as the attachment site for muscles that move the head, neck, and back and for muscles that act across the shoulder and hip joints to move their corresponding limbs.
The axial skeleton of the adult...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame Topic

Individualizing ANB angle based on Arab and German orthodontic cephalometric analysis: a cross-sectional multi-center study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sensor-derived wearing time predicts 3D orthodontic side effects during mandibular advancement therapy of obstructive sleep apnea.

Clinical oral investigations·2026
Same author

Applying Automated Artificial Intelligence Models on Lateral Cephalometric Parameters to Accurately Classify Arab Orthodontic Patient Patterns.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2026
Same author

Machine Learning and Clustering Analysis of Class II and III Malocclusions.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2026
Same author

Regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic therapy in the treatment of patients with stage IV periodontitis and pathologic tooth migration.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same author

Investigating a potential association between agenesis of the third molars and variations in dental crown dimensions.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.

Peter Proff1, Florian Will, Ivan Bokan

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. p.c.proff@gmx.net

The Angle Orthodontist
|April 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Skeletal Class III patients exhibit decreased basicranial angulation, confirming a link with mandibular protrusion. Minor alterations contribute to overall cranial base shortening, supporting the deficient orthocephalization hypothesis.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Craniofacial Morphology
  • Cephalometrics

Background:

  • Skeletal Class III malocclusion is characterized by mandibular prognathism.
  • Conflicting findings exist regarding cranial base morphology in Class III patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cranial base configuration in skeletal Class III patients.
  • To clarify conflicting literature findings on Class III cranial base morphology.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of lateral cephalographs from 54 Class III patients and 54 controls (aged 14-24).
  • Evaluation of 21 cephalometric variables, including basicranial measurements and jaw lengths relative to anterior cranial base length.

Main Results:

  • Class III patients showed significantly more acute cranial base angles (Ca-S-Ba, Se-S-Ba), indicating increased flexure.
  • Anterior condylar displacement was evident (reduced Se-S-Cd, Ar-Ca), with significantly increased relative mandibular length.
  • No significant reduction was found in overall cranial base length, anterior (N-S), or posterior (S-Ba, S-Ar) sections.

Conclusions:

  • Decreased basicranial angulation is confirmed in skeletal Class III patients, correlating with mandibular protrusion.
  • Overall cranial base shortening appears to result from multiple minor alterations.
  • Findings support the deficient orthocephalization hypothesis for Class III morphogenesis, though basicranial-maxillary relationships require further study.