Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
Published on: November 16, 2017
Differential lateralization for words and faces: category or psychophysics?
Evelyne Mercure1, Frederic Dick, Hanife Halit
1Center for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck-University of London, 32 Torrington Square, London, UK. e.mercure@psychology.bbk.ac.uk
This study on the N170 event-related potential (ERP) found that word and face processing lateralization differs based on factors like spatial frequency and presentation time. These psychophysical elements influence how the brain processes words versus faces.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psychophysics
Background:
- The N170 component of event-related potentials (ERPs) is a key neural marker for processing visual stimuli, particularly faces and words.
- Investigating the lateralization of the N170 provides insights into category-specific processing in the brain.
- Understanding the influence of psychophysical factors on N170 lateralization is crucial for refining models of visual cognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine how psychophysical factors affect the lateralization of the N170 ERP component for words and faces.
- To compare the differential effects of spatial frequency, presentation time, size, and resolution on word versus face N170 lateralization.
- To elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying category-specific visual processing.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted using electroencephalography (EEG) to record N170 ERPs.
- Stimuli included words and faces, manipulated across different spatial frequencies, presentation times, sizes, and resolutions.
- Analysis focused on the lateralization (left vs. right hemisphere activity) and amplitude of the N170 component.
Main Results:
- Words consistently elicited a left-lateralized N170, while face N170 lateralization varied with presentation conditions.
- Spatial frequency influenced word N170 lateralization, but not face N170 lateralization.
- Stimulus presentation time affected N170 lateralization for both words and faces, independent of spatial frequency. Stimulus size and resolution impacted N170 amplitude but not lateralization.
Conclusions:
- Differential N170 lateralization between words and faces is influenced by category, spatial frequency (for words), and stimulus presentation time.
- These findings highlight the complex interplay of stimulus properties and neural processing in category-specific visual recognition.
- The N170 serves as a sensitive measure for dissociating neural processing of different visual categories based on psychophysical parameters.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lateralization
Cerebral Hemispheres
Language and Cognition
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Lobes of the Cerebrum
Frontal lobe
The frontal lobes, located behind the forehead, are the command center of our brain, controlling personality, intelligence, and voluntary muscle movements.

