Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Preventive Healthcare Services01:30

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme.

European radiology·2019
Same author

An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme.

European radiology·2019
Same author

Disability and participation in breast and bowel cancer screening in England: a large prospective study.

British journal of cancer·2017
Same author

Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for cervical disease: executive summary of a recent symposium.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2015
Same author

Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2015
Same author

Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same journal

A cross-sectional survey of sample takers' views on HPV self-sampling for cervical screening in Ireland.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Cost-benefit analysis of an organized community-based multi-cancer screening program in Bangladesh.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to: Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination with a more plausible assumption.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to Takahashi regarding Bestwick and Wald: Mischaracterisation of evidence in prostate cancer screening.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Prostate cancer screening: The level of the evidence hierarchy.

Journal of medical screening·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage?

L Lancuck1, J Patnick, M Vessey

  • 1NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Fulwood House, Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield, UK.

Journal of Medical Screening
|April 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cervical screening coverage in England has declined since 2000, particularly in younger women. This trend appears to be a cohort effect, suggesting targeted interventions for women aged 25-34 are needed.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Gynecologic Oncology

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening is crucial for early detection and prevention.
  • Understanding trends in screening coverage is essential for public health strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze temporal trends in cervical screening coverage in England.
  • To identify demographic factors associated with changes in screening participation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of routinely collected cervical screening statistics in England.
  • Inclusion of all eligible women residents for cervical screening data.
  • Examination of coverage proportions over five-year intervals (1995-2005) by age groups.

Main Results:

  • Overall cervical screening coverage in England was over 82% from 1995-2000, declining to just over 80% by 2005.
  • Coverage varied by age, with lower rates in younger women (71% in 25-29 year olds) and higher rates in middle-aged women (83% in 35-54 year olds) in 2005.
  • A downward trend in screening rates was observed in women under 50, while rates increased in women over 55, suggesting a cohort effect linked to birth year.

Conclusions:

  • Falling cervical screening coverage, particularly in younger cohorts (born 1960s onwards), is a significant public health concern.
  • No specific cause for this decline is identified, but targeted interventions for women aged 25-34 are recommended to improve participation.