Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constituent-constrained word prediction during language comprehension.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Language Experience Shapes Neural Grouping of Speech by Accent: EEG Evidence from Native, Second-Language, and Heritage Listeners.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Mu rhythm motor-auditory delay in imagined speech mirrors overt speech timing.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Geometric properties of musical scales constitute a representational primitive in melodic processing.

iScience·2025
Same author

Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience as collections of practices.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging
10:48

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

Published on: June 3, 2013

Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography.

Philip J Monahan1, Robert Fiorentino, David Poeppel

  • 1Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Laboratory, University of Maryland, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742-7505, USA. pmonahan@umd.edu

Brain and Language
|April 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Masked priming studies reveal neural correlates of lexical access. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) effectively measures these brain responses during word retrieval, enhancing psycholinguistic research.

More Related Videos

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography
08:00

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Published on: April 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging
10:48

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

Published on: June 3, 2013

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
09:25

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Published on: July 26, 2019

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography
08:00

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Published on: April 8, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Masked priming is a key technique in psycholinguistics for studying lexical access and representation.
  • Previous electrophysiological evidence on neural correlates of priming has been inconsistent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of masked priming using magnetoencephalography (MEG).
  • To determine if MEG signals reflect specific aspects of lexical retrieval sensitive to priming effects.

Main Methods:

  • Two identity masked priming experiments were conducted.
  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record brain activity.
  • Stimuli involved word pairs differing only in case (e.g., NEWS-news) with forward or backward masking.

Main Results:

  • A significant behavioral priming effect was observed in both experiments.
  • MEG data revealed a neural component peaking around 225 ms post-target onset.
  • The latency of this MEG component was sensitive to repetition, indicating its relation to lexical processing.

Conclusions:

  • MEG responses can index specific lexical processing mechanisms.
  • Masked priming is a viable paradigm for MEG studies investigating lexical access.
  • This research clarifies the neural basis of word recognition and priming.