Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Cohort studies].

Stefan Mathis1, Gerald Gartlehner

  • 1Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Austria. stefan.mathis@hta.lbg.ac.at

Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)
|April 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochrane Evaluation of (Semi-) Automated Review Methods (CESAR): Protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Area under the likelihood curve as a measure of evidential weight in nonsignificant meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Evaluating search approaches for a network meta-analysis: a case study of Epistemonikos Database of Trials, CENTRAL, and other sources.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Evaluating evidential strength of statistically nonsignificant meta-analyses with likelihood ratios: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Reverse fragility index shows high fragility in Cochrane meta-analyses with P values between 0.05 and 0.20: a meta-epidemiological study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Regenerative therapies in rehabilitation with interfaces with occupational medicine, geriatrics, and oncology: the example of extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Cerebral toxoplasmosis in patients with peripheral B-cell lymphoma : A case series and a literature review.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Post-pandemic rebound of rotavirus and adenovirus in pediatric gastroenteritis: a 6-year antigen-based surveillance study from Turkey.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Neuroaxis involvement in Chikungunya virus infection: a retrospective case series.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

A complicated case of a spinal Scedosporium apiospermum infection with a favorable outcome-case report.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
See all related articles

This article explains cohort studies, a key observational research design. It details their characteristics, benefits, drawbacks, and how to critically evaluate their validity and significance in health technology assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Health Research Methodology
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Cohort studies are a fundamental observational study design.
  • This article is part of a series on study designs by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the theoretical concept and characteristics of cohort studies.
  • To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of cohort studies.
  • To provide guidance for critically evaluating the significance and validity of cohort studies.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of observational design characteristics.
  • Exploration of methods for acquiring control groups.
  • Analysis of potential biases like selection bias and confounding.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cohort studies are valuable for measuring environmental exposure effects.
  • They are useful for identifying rare side effects when randomized controlled trials are limited.
  • Cohort studies assess disease or condition incidence.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding cohort study design is crucial for rigorous health research.
  • Critical evaluation of cohort studies involves assessing their observational nature and potential biases.
  • Cohort studies offer unique insights when other designs are not feasible.