Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
Published on: May 22, 2020
Hot filter/impinger and dilution sampling for fine particulate matter characterization from ferrous metal casting
Sue Anne N Sheya1, Clifford Glowacki, Ming-Chih Oliver Chang
1Technikon, LLC, McClellan, CA 95652, USA. ssheya@technikonllc.com
The shakeout process in metal casting generates significant particulate matter (PM) emissions. Standard sampling methods can overestimate fine particulate matter (PM2.5) due to capturing dissolved gases.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Industrial Hygiene
- Chemical Engineering
Background:
- Particulate matter (PM) emissions from industrial processes are a key environmental concern.
- Accurate measurement of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is crucial for health and regulatory purposes.
- Ferrous iron metal casting involves multiple stages that can release PM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare two distinct stack-sampling methodologies for collecting PM emissions from ferrous iron metal casting.
- To quantify the contribution of different casting stages, particularly shakeout, to PM emissions.
- To evaluate the impact of sampling methods on the measured mass and composition of PM2.5.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a hot filter/cold impinger sampling train and a dilution sampler to collect PM from casting processes.
- Collected samples during molten iron pouring, cooling, shakeout, and post-shakeout cooling stages.
- Analyzed the mass, composition, and aerodynamic diameter of collected particulate matter.
Main Results:
- The shakeout process was identified as a major contributor to PM emissions compared to pouring and cooling.
- The hot filter/impinger method yielded significantly higher PM2.5 mass emissions (3.4–4.7 lb/t) than the dilution method (0.8–1.8 lb/t).
- A substantial portion of PM captured by impingers (32–38% of total suspended particles) was organic and likely dissolved gases, causing a 2-4x positive bias in PM2.5 measurements.
Conclusions:
- The choice of sampling methodology significantly impacts PM2.5 emission estimates in metal casting.
- Impinger-captured PM, often composed of dissolved gases, can lead to overestimation of condensable PM2.5.
- Accurate characterization of PM emissions requires careful consideration of sampling train components and potential interferences.
Related Concept Videos
Filtration
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Washing, Drying, and Ignition of Precipitates
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...

