Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Comparison of 2-h versus 3-h enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight infants, commencing after birth
Mario Rüdiger1, Sandra Herrmann, Gerd Schmalisch
1Medical University Innsbruck, Department for Pediatrics, Pädiatrie IV-Neonatologie, Austria. mario.ruediger@i-med.ac.at
Insights
Feeding extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants every 2 hours, compared to 3 hours, shows similar weight gain and time to full enteral nutrition. However, 2-hour intervals may reduce the need for phototherapy and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Enteral nutrition is crucial for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
- Feeding immaturity in ELBW infants presents challenges.
- Current feeding interval practices lack comparative data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of 2-hour versus 3-hour enteral feeding intervals in ELBW infants.
- To evaluate the impact of feeding regimens on nutritional status and clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study analyzing ELBW infant charts before and after a feeding regimen change from 2-hour to 3-hour intervals.
- Inclusion of infants from January 1999 to July 2003.
- Comparison of outcomes including time to complete enteral feeding, morbidity, length of stay, and growth parameters.
Main Results:
- No statistical difference in median time to complete enteral feeding between 2-hour (26 days) and 3-hour (20 days) groups.
- Similar rates of enteral morbidity (necrotizing enterocolitis, abdominal surgery, feeding intolerance), length of stay, and growth parameters.
- Significantly longer duration of phototherapy and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support in the 3-hour feeding group (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Both 2-hour and 3-hour enteral feeding regimens result in comparable weight gain and time to achieve full enteral nutrition in ELBW infants.
- Evidence suggests a potential advantage of 2-hour feedings in reducing the duration of phototherapy and CPAP support.
- Further research may be warranted to optimize feeding strategies for vulnerable ELBW populations.
Aim:
Immaturity is associated with problems in enteral nutrition of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Different time intervals between single feedings are used; however, no data are available to show a benefit of either regime.
Methods:
In January 2001 enteral feeding regime was changed from 2-h to 3-h intervals. In a retrospective study charts were analysed for all ELBW infants during a period of 2 years prior (01/99-12/00) and after (08/01-07/03) changing the feeding regime.
Results:
Forty-two in the 2-h group (gestational age 27 +/- 2.1, birth weight 797 +/-150) and 32 infants in 3-h (GA 26.9 +/- 1.8 weeks, BW 809 +/- 148 g) were included. Median (range) time until complete enteral feeding (26 (7 to 69) vs. 20 (12 to 58) days) was not statistical different. There were no differences with respect to enteral morbidity (NEC, abdominal surgery, feeding intolerance), length of stay (84 +/- 23 vs. 86 +/- 26 days), growth parameters or weight at discharge. Total duration of phototherapy and average length of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support were significantly (p < 0.01) longer in the 3-h feeding group.
Conclusion:
Weight gain and time until complete enteral nutrition are similar in 2-h and 3-h feeding regimes. Data suggest an advantage of 2-h feedings concerning the length of CPAP and phototherapy.
More Related Videos
05:04A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption