Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026
14:56
An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
Published on: January 27, 2010
Pre-operative prediction of 'dry taps'
1Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK. scott.henney@doctors.org.uk
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
|April 22, 2008
Summary
A dry tap during myringotomy for glue ear in children is often predicted by non-type B tympanometry and surgical delays. This finding helps surgeons anticipate cases where no middle ear fluid is found.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Anesthesiology in Otologic Surgery
Background:
- 'Glue ear' (otitis media with effusion) management involves myringotomy and grommet insertion.
- Surgeons face uncertainty when myringotomy yields no middle ear fluid (a 'dry tap').
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors predicting a 'dry tap' during myringotomy in children.
- To improve surgical decision-making in pediatric otitis media with effusion.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study of 280 children (504 myringotomies).
- Data collected: pre- and post-induction tympanometry, age, season, anesthetic type (halothane/nitrous oxide vs. enflurane), and delay from listing to operation.
- Myringotomy outcomes (fluid presence or 'dry tap') were documented.
Main Results:
- A 'dry tap' occurred in 18% of myringotomies.
- Non-type B pre-induction tympanometry and longer delays to operation were significant predictors of a 'dry tap'.
- Anesthesia induction was rarely the cause of a 'dry tap'.
Conclusions:
- Non-type B tympanometry and surgical delay are key indicators for predicting 'dry taps' in pediatric myringotomy.
- These findings can help optimize surgical planning and resource allocation.
- Understanding 'dry tap' predictors aids in managing children with otitis media with effusion.
Related Concept Videos
01:18Errors in Taping
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
01:12Taping Over Different Ground Profiles
Taping over varying ground profiles requires careful adaptation to achieve accurate measurements. On smooth, level ground with minimal vegetation, the tape can rest directly on the ground. Here, the taping team, typically consisting of a head and a rear tapeman, coordinates their positions with clear communication. The rear tapeman holds the tape at the starting point and guides the head tapeman toward a range pole placed beyond the endpoint, using hand or voice signals to ensure alignment.On...