Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Novel Triple-Loop Technique for Suturing TFCC Injuries without Transosseous Tunnel
Published on: May 23, 2025
Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children
A Abraham1, H H G Handoll, T Khan
1Leicester Royal Infirmary, Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Wd 14, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK, LE1 5WW. alwyn.abraham@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
Insights
Removable splints show promise for pediatric buckle fractures, and below-elbow casts are effective for displaced wrist fractures. Further research is needed to confirm long-term outcomes for surgical fixation.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Pediatric Traumatology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Wrist fractures are common in children, accounting for approximately one-third of all pediatric fractures.
- These injuries often result from falls onto an outstretched hand.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate removable splintage versus plaster casts for undisplaced buckle fractures in children.
- To assess cast length and position for pediatric wrist fractures.
- To determine the role of surgical fixation for displaced wrist fractures in children.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
- Searched multiple databases including Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to October 2007.
- Included 10 trials involving 827 children, assessing variable quality.
Main Results:
- Removable splintage showed no short-term deformity and was preferred by children and parents for buckle fractures.
- Below-elbow casts were less restrictive and did not increase redisplacement or complications compared to above-elbow casts.
- Percutaneous wiring reduced redisplacement but functional outcomes at three months were not improved.
Conclusions:
- Limited evidence supports removable splintage for buckle fractures, challenging traditional above-elbow casting for displaced fractures.
- Percutaneous wire fixation prevents redisplacement, but long-term functional outcomes require further investigation.
- Further research is needed on optimal splintage for buckle fractures and indications for surgery in displaced wrist fractures.
Background:
Approximately a third of all fractures in children occur at the wrist, usually from falling onto an outstretched hand.
Objectives:
We aimed to evaluate removable splintage versus plaster casts (requiring removal by a specialist) for undisplaced compression (buckle) fractures; cast length and position; and the role of surgical fixation for displaced wrist fractures in children.
Search Strategy:
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (October 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1988), CINAHL (from 1982) and reference lists of articles. Date of last search October 2007.
Selection Criteria:
Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing types and position of casts and the use of surgical fixation for distal radius fractures in children.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors performed trial selection. All three authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data.
Main Results:
The 10 included trials, involving 827 children, were of variable quality.Four trials compared removable splintage versus the traditional below-elbow cast in children with buckle fractures. There was no short-term deformity recorded in all four trials and, in one trial, no refracture at six months. The Futura splint was cheaper to use; a removable plaster splint was less restrictive to wear enabling more children to bathe and participate in other activities, and the option preferred by children and parents; the soft bandage was more comfortable, convenient and less painful to wear; home-removable plaster casts removed by parents did not result in significant differences in outcome but were strongly favoured by parents. Two trials found below-elbow versus above-elbow casts did not increase redisplacement of reduced fractures or cast-related complications, were less restrictive during use and avoided elbow stiffness. One trial evaluating the effect of arm position in above-elbow casts found no effect on deformity. Three trials found that percutaneous wiring significantly reduced redisplacement and remanipulation but one of these found no advantage in function at three months.
Authors' Conclusions:
Limited evidence supports the use of removable splintage for buckle fractures and challenges the traditional use of above-elbow casts after reduction of displaced fractures. Although percutaneous wire fixation prevents redisplacement, the effects on longer term outcomes including function are not established. Further research is warranted on the optimum approach, including splintage, for buckle fractures; and on the use of below-elbow casts and indications for surgery for displaced wrist fractures in children.
More Related Videos
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care