Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Monitoring Cell-autonomous Circadian Clock Rhythms of Gene Expression Using Luciferase Bioluminescence Reporters
Published on: September 27, 2012
Rate constants rather than biochemical mechanism determine behaviour of genetic clocks
Emery Conrad1, Avraham E Mayo, Alexander J Ninfa
1Mathematical Biology Research Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Abstract:
Many biological systems contain both positive and negative feedbacks. These are often classified as resonators or integrators. Resonators respond preferentially to oscillating signals of a particular frequency. Integrators, on the other hand, accumulate a response to signals. Computational neuroscientists often refer to neurons showing integrator properties as type I neurons and those showing resonator properties as type II neurons. Guantes & Poyatos have shown that type I or type II behaviour can be seen in genetic clocks. They argue that when negative feedback occurs through transcription regulation and post-translationally, genetic clocks act as integrators and resonators, respectively. Here we show that either behaviour can be seen with either design and in a wide range of genetic clocks. This highlights the importance of parameters rather than biochemical mechanism in determining the system behaviour.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Regulation of Metabolism
Constitutive and Regulated Gene Expression

