Volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of decreasing volume

Rocco Ricciardi1, Beth A Virnig, James W Ogilvie

  • 1Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Tufts University, 41 Mall Rd, Burlington, MA 01805, USA. rocco.ricciardi@lahey.org

Insights

Despite a decline in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) volume since 1997, in-hospital mortality rates have also decreased. This study found that lower CABG volume is associated with improved patient outcomes, challenging previous assumptions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a major cardiac procedure.
  • Concerns exist regarding the impact of decreasing procedure volumes on patient outcomes.
  • Hospital volume has been proposed as a predictor of surgical success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between changes in CABG procedure volume and in-hospital mortality rates.
  • To determine if a reduction in CABG volume correlates with an increase in mortality.
  • To evaluate the predictive value of procedure volume for patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a 20% random sample of US hospital discharge data from 1988 to 2003 (Nationwide Inpatient Sample).
  • Inclusion of all patients undergoing CABG or percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions.
  • Assessment of cardiac procedure rates, hospital volume categories, and CABG mortality rates.

Main Results:

  • CABG rates increased until 1997, then declined by 2003, while percutaneous interventions tripled.
  • The proportion of high-volume CABG hospitals decreased significantly from 1997 to 2003.
  • Despite declining CABG volume, the in-hospital mortality rate steadily decreased from 5.4% to 3.3% over the study period.

Conclusions:

  • CABG volume has decreased since 1997, coinciding with a reduction in in-hospital mortality.
  • Reduced CABG volume is associated with lower mortality, a counterintuitive finding.
  • Procedure volume alone may be an insufficient predictor for healthcare regionalization strategies.
Abstract