Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026
An Assay to Detect Protection of the Retinal Vasculature from Diabetes-Related Death in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2024
Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: an analysis of diagnostic performance
Michael F Chiang1, Rony Gelman, Lei Jiang
1Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Purpose:
To measure agreement and accuracy of plus disease diagnosis among retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts; and to compare expert performance to that of a computer-based analysis system, Retinal Image multiScale Analysis.
Methods:
Twenty-two recognized ROP experts independently interpreted a set of 34 wide-angle retinal photographs for presence of plus disease. Diagnostic agreement was analyzed. A reference standard was defined based on majority vote of experts. Images were analyzed using individual and linear combinations of computer-based system parameters for arterioles and venules: integrated curvature (IC), diameter, and tortuosity index (TI). Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (AUC) for plus disease diagnosis were determined for each expert and for the computer-based system.
Results:
Mean kappa statistic for each expert compared to all others was between 0 and 0.20 (slight agreement) in 1 expert (4.5%), 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agreement) in 3 experts (13.6%), 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) in 12 experts (54.5%), and 0.61 and 0.80 (substantial agreement) in 6 experts (27.3%). For the 22 experts, sensitivity compared to the reference standard ranged from 0.308 to 1.000, specificity from 0.571 to 1.000, and AUC from 0.784 to 1.000. Among individual computer system parameters compared to the reference standard, venular IC had highest AUC (0.853). Among linear combinations of parameters, the combination of arteriolar IC, arteriolar TI, venular IC, venular diameter, and venular TI had highest AUC (0.967).
Conclusion:
Agreement and accuracy of plus disease diagnosis among ROP experts are imperfect. A computer-based system has potential to perform with comparable or better accuracy than human experts, but further validation is required.
