Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pedigree selection and information content.

E R Hauser1, D E Weeks

  • 1Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Current Protocols in Human Genetics
|April 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A genome-wide association study of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in Samoan women.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Sex-Specific Skeletal Muscle Gene Expression Responses to Exercise Reveal Novel Direct Mediators of Insulin Sensitivity Change.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Characterizing Deficit Accumulation Among Gulf War Era Veterans.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2024
Same author

Self-reported gastrointestinal disorders among veterans with gulf war illness with and without posttraumatic stress disorder.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2023
Same author

A missense variant in CREBRF, rs373863828, is associated with fat-free mass, not fat mass in Samoan infants.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2020
Same author

Effect of Ar(3p<sup>5</sup>4p; 2p)+M → Ar(3p<sup>5</sup>4s; 1s)+M branching ratio on optically pumped rare gas laser performance.

Optics express·2019
Same journal

Resolving Breakpoints of Chromosomal Rearrangements at the Nucleotide Level Using Sanger Sequencing.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
Same journal

Informed Consent for Genetic and Genomic Research.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
Same journal

A Guide to Using ClinTAD for Interpretation of DNA Copy Number Variants in the Context of Topologically Associated Domains.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
Same journal

The AD Knowledge Portal: A Repository for Multi-Omic Data on Alzheimer's Disease and Aging.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
Same journal

A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
Same journal

Identification and Genotyping of Transposable Element Insertions From Genome Sequencing Data.

Current protocols in human genetics·2020
See all related articles

This guide details selecting pedigrees for linkage analysis, crucial for genetic studies. It explains methods to assess dataset power for detecting genetic loci using both model-based and model-free approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Linkage analysis is fundamental for identifying genes associated with diseases.
  • Accurate pedigree selection is critical for the success of genetic linkage studies.
  • Existing methods require careful consideration of dataset power and analytical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline essential criteria for selecting appropriate pedigrees for linkage analysis.
  • To describe methods for evaluating the statistical power of datasets in genetic studies.
  • To cover both model-based and model-free linkage analysis techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Review of criteria for pedigree selection in genetic studies.
  • Explanation of power calculation methods for linkage analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of lod score analysis for model-based studies.
  • Overview of affected sib-pair and affected-relative pair analyses for model-free studies.
  • Main Results:

    • Provides a framework for optimal pedigree selection.
    • Enables researchers to determine the power of their datasets.
    • Facilitates the choice between model-based and model-free analytical strategies.

    Conclusions:

    • Appropriate pedigree selection significantly enhances the power of linkage analysis.
    • Understanding dataset power is key to successfully detecting genetic loci.
    • This unit serves as a guide for researchers conducting genetic linkage studies.