Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Global shape versus local feature: an angle illusion.

Graeme J Kennedy1, Harry S Orbach, Gunter Loffler

  • 1Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, Scotland, UK.

Vision Research
|April 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geometrically nonlinear high-fidelity aerostructural optimization for highly flexible wings.

Structural and multidisciplinary optimization : journal of the International Society for Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization·2025
Same author

Healthy aging impairs face discrimination ability.

Journal of vision·2022
Same author

Measuring the foveal avascular zone in diabetes: A study using optical coherence tomography angiography.

Journal of diabetes investigation·2021
Same author

Correction to: Sub-clinical thickening of the fovea in diabetes and its relationship to glycaemic control: a study using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2020
Same author

Sub-clinical thickening of the fovea in diabetes and its relationship to glycaemic control: a study using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2020
Same author

Correction: Assessing the effect of Independent Prescribing for community optometrists and referral rates to Hospital Eye Services in Scotland.

Eye (London, England)·2020
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

The perceived size of an angle is influenced by the overall shape it belongs to. Angles in isosceles triangles appear larger than identical angles in scalene triangles, revealing a novel visual illusion.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Geometric illusion
  • Human psychophysics

Background:

  • Angle discrimination precision is affected by global stimulus configuration.
  • Angles within isosceles triangles show lower discrimination thresholds than those in scalene triangles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the perceived size (accuracy) of an angle is influenced by its encompassing shape.
  • To compare perceived angle sizes within isosceles versus scalene triangles.

Main Methods:

  • Observers compared relative angle sizes in isosceles and scalene triangles.
  • Determined points of subjective equality for angle perception.

Main Results:

  • Angles in isosceles triangles were perceived as 14 degrees larger than identical angles in scalene triangles (for a 60-degree reference).

Related Experiment Videos

  • This effect was robust across different reference angles, triangle orientations, and sizes.
  • The illusion persisted regardless of triangle area, presence of the opposite side, or vertex representation (outline vs. dots).

    • Conclusions:

    • A novel visual illusion demonstrates that angles within isosceles triangles are perceived as substantially larger than identical angles in scalene triangles.
    • Angle computation mechanisms are sensitive to the contextual geometric configuration of the stimulus.