Comparison of methods for detection of pinworms in mice and rats

J Camille Effler1, Judy M Hickman-Davis, Julie G Erwin

  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Lab Animal
|April 24, 2008
PubMed

Insights

Pinworm infestation is common in lab rodents. Researchers compared multiple detection methods, finding they were similarly effective but recommend using combined approaches for better pinworm detection in rodent colonies.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Science
  • Laboratory Animal Science
  • Parasitology

Background:

  • Pinworm (Syphacia sp.) infestations are prevalent in laboratory rodent colonies.
  • Limited data exists on current pinworm detection practices and their efficacy.
  • Effective detection is crucial for maintaining research integrity and animal welfare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey current pinworm detection methods used in research institutions.
  • To evaluate and compare the efficacy of various pinworm detection techniques.
  • To provide recommendations for optimal pinworm diagnosis in rodent colonies.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of research institutions on pinworm prevalence and detection strategies.
  • Comparative analysis of perianal tape tests, fecal flotation, fecal concentration, cecal content examination, cecal flotation, and histological examination.
  • Testing of mice and rats from known Syphacia sp. infested colonies.

Main Results:

  • Multiple detection methods demonstrated comparable overall efficacy for pinworm diagnosis.
  • No single method significantly outperformed others in all tested scenarios.
  • Survey data revealed variations in current institutional practices.

Conclusions:

  • While several methods are effective, no single technique guarantees complete detection.
  • Combining multiple diagnostic tests is recommended to maximize pinworm detection rates.
  • Standardizing detection protocols could improve accuracy in laboratory rodent colonies.

Related Concept Videos