Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distinct haptic cues do not reduce interference when learning to reach in multiple force fields.

Nicholas Cothros1, Jeremy Wong, Paul L Gribble

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Plos One
|April 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A context-free model of savings in motor learning.

eLife·2026
Same author

Oncological Outcomes for Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the United Kingdom: Results From a National Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection following hip or knee arthroplasty : a single-centre, registry-linked cohort study of 30,102 cases conducted at a national orthopaedic treatment centre.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Glucosylceramide-induced ectosomes propagate pathogenic α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease.

Nature cell biology·2026
Same author

Youth with essential tremor differ from age-matched controls in multiple aspects of visually-guided reaching movements.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Sensory expectations shape neural population dynamics in motor circuits.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Learning multiple force fields is challenging due to interference. Associating different haptic cues with distinct force fields did not reduce this interference in motor learning.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human motor learning
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Adapting reaching movements to novel forces often leads to interference when learning multiple force fields.
  • Force field learning may involve object manipulation, with haptic cues potentially signaling dynamic conditions.
  • Previous research has not explored if distinct haptic cues reduce interference in learning multiple force fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if associating different force fields with distinct haptic cues reduces interference in motor learning.
  • To determine if differentiated tactile or haptic cues can promote the learning and retention of multiple motor skills.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects performed reaching movements using a robotic manipulandum applying opposing velocity-dependent curl force fields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • One group used different handles for each force field, while a control group used the same handle for both.
  • Interference was assessed by comparing learning performance between groups.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant reduction in interference was observed when different force fields were associated with differently shaped handles.
    • Subjects using distinct handles showed similar interference levels compared to control subjects using a single handle.

    Conclusions:

    • Haptic cues alone are insufficient to mitigate interference in learning multiple force fields within this experimental paradigm.
    • The findings suggest that static haptic differences do not effectively differentiate dynamic motor learning conditions.