Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Do larger studies find smaller effects? The example of studies for the prevention of conduct disorder
Brid McMahon1, Louise Holly, Richard Harrington
1Thorn Road Clinic, Thorn Road, Runcorn, Cheshire, WA7 5HQ, UK.
Introduction:
There is some emerging evidence in medicine that larger clinical trials tend to be associated with smaller effect sizes. Much of the evidence-base currently informing practice in Child Psychiatry relies on relatively small trials. We therefore investigated the relationship between trial size and effect size in research within a key area of child mental health.
Method:
A recent systematic review of 20 trials of prevention of conduct disorder was subjected to meta-regression, to examine the relationship between study size and effect size, and to explore hypothesised confounding variables.
Results:
In this sample of studies, reported effect size was inversely related to sample size. This effect is not explained by year of publication, intervention type or quality of methodology in the study.
Discussion:
Our finding is consistent with other reports in the literature. The origin of this effect is not yet clear. However if replicated it clearly has significant implications for the way trials in child mental health are interpreted.
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Statistical Significance
Longitudinal Research
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.