Related Experiment Videos
Selection of response criteria for clinical trials of sarcoma treatment
Scott M Schuetze1, Laurence H Baker, Robert S Benjamin
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, C409 MIB, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5843, USA. scotschu@umich
Abstract:
Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. A large number of new therapies are being evaluated in patients with sarcomas, and consensus criteria defining treatment responses are essential for comparison of results from studies completed by different research groups. The 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) handbook set forth operationally defined criteria for response evaluation in solid tumors that were updated in 2000 with the publication of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). There have been significant advances in tumor imaging, however, that are not reflected in the RECIST. For example, computed tomography (CT) slice thickness has been reduced from 10 mm to < or =2.5 mm, allowing for more reproducible and accurate measurement of smaller lesions. Combination of imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) and CT can provide investigators and clinicians with both anatomical and functional information regarding tumors, and there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of PET/CT and other newer imaging methods for the detection and staging of tumors as well as early determination of responses to therapy. The application of newer imaging methods has the potential to decrease both the sample sizes required for, and duration of, clinical trials by providing an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes, such as time to tumor progression or overall survival. The results summarized in this review support the conclusion that the RECIST and the WHO criteria for evaluation of response in solid tumors need to be modernized. In addition, there is a current need for prospective trials to compare new response criteria with established endpoints and to validate imaging-based response rates as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials of new agents for sarcoma and other solid tumors.
Insights
Current sarcoma treatment response criteria are outdated. Advances in imaging like PET/CT necessitate modernized evaluation methods for more efficient clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Soft tissue sarcomas are diverse cancers requiring standardized response evaluation.
- Established criteria like Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) need updating.
- Imaging technology has advanced significantly beyond current RECIST guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the limitations of current sarcoma response evaluation criteria.
- To highlight the impact of advanced imaging techniques on tumor assessment.
- To advocate for modernized criteria and validation studies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on sarcoma response criteria and imaging.
- Analysis of advancements in computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) imaging.
- Discussion of the potential of new imaging methods in clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Current RECIST and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria do not incorporate modern imaging capabilities.
- Advanced imaging (e.g., PET/CT) offers superior anatomical and functional tumor insights.
- Newer imaging methods can potentially shorten clinical trials and reduce sample sizes.
Conclusions:
- The RECIST and WHO criteria require modernization to reflect current imaging technology.
- Prospective trials are needed to validate new response criteria and imaging-based endpoints.
- Validated imaging endpoints can improve the efficiency of clinical trials for sarcoma therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...