Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin when force-titrated in patients with primary
Ole Faergeman1, Laurie Hill, Eberhard Windler
1Aarhus Sygehus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Insights
Force-titrated rosuvastatin (10-40 mg) significantly improved lipid profiles and helped more high-risk patients reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals compared to atorvastatin (10-80 mg). This study highlights rosuvastatin
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular disease
- Lipid metabolism
- Pharmacology
Background:
- High-risk cardiovascular disease patients often do not achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets due to suboptimal statin titration.
- The ECLIPSE study investigated rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of force-titrated rosuvastatin (10-40 mg) against force-titrated atorvastatin (10-80 mg).
- To assess the ability of each statin to help high-risk patients achieve LDL-C goals.
Main Methods:
- A 24-week, open-label, randomized, multinational, parallel-group study.
- 1,036 patients with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to rosuvastatin (n=522) or atorvastatin (n=514).
Main Results:
- Significantly more patients on rosuvastatin achieved LDL-C goals (<100 mg/dl, <2.5/3.0 mmol/l, and <70 mg/dl) compared to atorvastatin (p < 0.001).
- Rosuvastatin demonstrated superior improvements in the atherogenic lipid profile.
- Both treatments were well-tolerated.
Conclusions:
- Force-titrated rosuvastatin provides superior lipoprotein profile modification versus atorvastatin.
- Rosuvastatin enables a greater proportion of high-risk patients to attain recommended LDL-C goals.
Background:
Patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease frequently fail to reach recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, partly because statin doses are not titrated to optimal effect. The ECLIPSE study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of force-titrated treatment with rosuvastatin (10-40 mg) with that of atorvastatin (10-80 mg) in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Methods:
In this 24-week, open-label, randomized, multinational, parallel-group study, 1,036 patients were randomized to rosuvastatin (n = 522) or atorvastatin (n = 514).
Results:
At all time points, a significantly greater percentage of patients on rosuvastatin treatment achieved the NCEP ATP III LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l), the 2003 European LDL-C target of <2.5 or 3.0 mmol/l (100 or 115 mg/dl) and the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l), a goal suggested for very high-risk patients (p < 0.001 for all). Rosuvastatin also achieved significantly greater improvements in components of the atherogenic lipid profile versus atorvastatin. Both treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion:
Rosuvastatin titrated across its recommended dose range provides a more favorable effect on lipoprotein variables than atorvastatin, enabling more high-risk patients to achieve recommended LDL-C goals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Time Course of Drug Effect
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System III: Serum Lipid Profile
Serum lipids are fats and fatty substances in the blood and are crucial for various bodily functions, including energy storage, cellular structure, and hormone production. Serum lipids consist of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids.
Cholesterol is a soft, fat-like substance found in all body cells. It is crucial for producing hormones, vitamin D, and substances that aid...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
