Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors for Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity Following Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2021
Same author

Migraine remains second among the world's causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019.

The journal of headache and pain·2020
Same author

A randomized study of KRAS-guided maintenance therapy with bevacizumab, erlotinib or metronomic capecitabine after first-line induction treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT2 trial.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2015
Same author

Clinical outcome in a Norwegian cohort of patients with chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2015
Same author

Earth-like aqueous debris-flow activity on Mars at high orbital obliquity in the last million years.

Nature communications·2015
Same author

The Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study: objectives and design.

Journal of internal medicine·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
08:33

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields.

L J Stovner1, G Oftedal, A Straume

  • 1St. Olav's Hospital, Norwegian National Headache Centre, Trondheim and Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Neuroscience, Trondheim, Norway. lars.stovner@ntnu.no

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum
|June 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Headaches associated with mobile phone use are not caused by radiofrequency (RF) fields. Instead, research suggests that negative expectations, known as the nocebo effect, are the likely trigger for these headaches.

More Related Videos

Dural Stimulation and Periorbital von Frey Testing in Mice As a Preclinical Model of Headache
05:40

Dural Stimulation and Periorbital von Frey Testing in Mice As a Preclinical Model of Headache

Published on: July 29, 2021

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
08:33

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Dural Stimulation and Periorbital von Frey Testing in Mice As a Preclinical Model of Headache
05:40

Dural Stimulation and Periorbital von Frey Testing in Mice As a Preclinical Model of Headache

Published on: July 29, 2021

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Mobile phone use is widespread, with many reporting headaches linked to it.
  • Previous double-blind provocation studies found no association between radiofrequency (RF) fields and mobile phone headaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the characteristics of headaches experienced during a mobile phone radiofrequency (RF) provocation study.
  • To investigate potential causes and mechanisms behind mobile phone-related headaches.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed questionnaires about headache type and location.
  • Headache locations were indicated on a diagram.
  • Interviews with a neurologist were conducted to diagnose headache features.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in headache type, laterality, or location were found between radiofrequency (RF) and sham exposures.
  • The majority of headaches reported were consistent with tension-type headaches.

Conclusions:

  • Headaches occurred regardless of RF exposure, suggesting factors beyond RF fields are involved.
  • The absence of mobile phone use stress and specific arm/head positioning indicates a likely nocebo effect.
  • Headaches linked to mobile phone use are probably not caused by RF fields, with the nocebo effect playing a significant role.