Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
Technical note: comparing coherent and incoherent scatter effects for cone-beam CT
Yiannis Kyriakou1, Michael Meyer, Willi A Kalender
1Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. yiannis.kyriakou@imp.uni-erlangen.de
Abstract:
The intensity and distribution of scatter is of growing interest in the case of flat-detector CT (FD-CT) scanners. It is generally assumed that scatter is an offset distribution dominated by incoherent scatter (Compton effect). Coherent and incoherent scatter were computed with respect to acquisition parameters used in FD-CT. A hybrid method optimized the performance of the scatter simulation: a fast and exact analytical calculation of the single-scatter intensity combined with a coarse Monte Carlo (MC) estimate of multiple scatter to reduce overall computational expenses, while assuring an acceptable signal quality. The simulation package allowed for the separation of both coherent and incoherent single scatter. For cylindrical water phantoms varying from 40 mm to 320 mm diameter and for various z-collimations an investigation of the ratio of single-to-total scatter was performed. The intensity distribution of scatter (including coherent single scatter, incoherent single scatter and total scatter) was computed for phantoms of 160 mm and 320 mm diameter and energies varying from 40 keV to 120 keV. Additionally, voxel phantoms were generated from clinical head and thorax CT datasets and were employed in scatter simulations to demonstrate the effect of coherent and incoherent single scatter on the 2D projections. Single scatter determines a significant fraction of total scatter even for large body-sized phantoms and large field of measurement. Coherent scatter dominates the distribution of total scatter for most of the simulated cases, even for 120 keV. The Compton effect appeared to be less influential with respect to spatial distribution but dominated the overall magnitude.
More Related Videos
05:49Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
12:54Simultaneous Brightfield, Fluorescence, and Optical Coherence Tomographic Imaging of Contracting Cardiac Trabeculae Ex Vivo
Published on: October 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET