Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects
Peter Wühr1, Rupert Biebl, Ulrich Ansorge
1Institut für Psychologie I, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen, Germany. peter.wuehr@psy.phil.uni-erlangen.de
Abstract:
Six experiments investigated how variability on irrelevant stimulus dimensions and variability on response dimensions contribute to spatial and nonspatial stimulus-response (S-R) correspondence effects. Experiments 1-3 showed that, when stimuli varied in location and number, S-R correspondence effects for location or numerosity occurred when responses varied on these dimensions but not when responses were invariant on these dimensions. These results are consistent with the response-discrimination account, according to which S-R correspondence effects should only arise for a dimension that is used for discriminating between responses in working memory. Experiments 4-6 showed that, when responses varied in location and number, both invariant and variable stimulus number produced correspondence effects in S-R numerosity. In summary, the present results indicate that the usefulness of a particular dimension for response discrimination can be sufficient for producing S-R correspondence effects, whereas variability of a stimulus dimension is not sufficient for producing such effects.
Related Concept Videos
Correspondence Bias
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Cause and Effect
Random and Systematic Errors

