Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Is truth a supreme value?

R Peleg1

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 653, Beer-Sheva, Israel. pelegr@bgumail.bgu.ac.il

Journal of Medical Ethics
|May 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary lactase deficiency and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2019
Same author

Does primary lactase deficiency reduce bone mineral density in postmenopausal women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2018
Same author

Traditional Cautery for Medical Treatment Among the Bedouins of Southern Israel.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2015
Same author

Screening tests among family doctors: do we do as we preach?

Public health·2013
Same author

Informal medicine: ethical analysis.

Journal of medical ethics·2005
Same author

[Knowledge, attitudes and training of family physicians with regard to addiction to illicit drugs].

Harefuah·2002
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Doctors sometimes face dilemmas where truth conflicts with other values. In a case involving a pregnant Muslim woman fearing honor killings, the doctor prioritized saving her life over reporting the truth.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Medical professionals frequently encounter ethical dilemmas involving conflicting values.
  • The principle of truth-telling in medicine can be challenged by other ethical considerations.
  • Cultural contexts, such as the risk of honor killings, can create complex medical scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical conflict between the value of truth and the value of life in a clinical setting.
  • To examine a specific case where a physician had to decide whether to falsify a document to protect a patient.
  • To discuss the justification for prioritizing life over absolute truth-telling in extreme circumstances.

Main Methods:

  • Case study analysis of a real-world medical ethical dilemma.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative reflection on the physician's decision-making process.
  • Ethical reasoning based on established principles of medical ethics.

    • Main Results:

    • The physician faced a pregnant patient requesting a false document to avoid potential honor-related violence.
    • The physician determined that the value of the patient's life superseded the obligation to report the truth.
    • A decision was made to prioritize patient safety and life preservation over strict adherence to truth-telling.

    Conclusions:

    • In critical situations, the value of human life can ethically justify deviating from the principle of truth-telling.
    • Physicians must navigate complex ethical landscapes, balancing competing values to ensure patient well-being.
    • This case highlights the importance of considering patient safety and cultural context in medical decision-making.