Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems for congenital hip

C K Yiannakopoulos1, A Chougle, A Eskelinen

  • 1Nikis 2, 14561 Athens, Greece. cky@ath.forthnet.gr

Insights

The Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications for developmental dysplasia of the hip show substantial to almost perfect reliability among experienced surgeons for adult hip osteoarthritis assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology
  • Surgical Assessment

Background:

  • Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common condition.
  • Accurate classification systems are crucial for treatment planning in adult hip osteoarthritis.
  • The Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications are widely used for DDH.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems.
  • To assess the consistency of these classifications in adult hip osteoarthritis.
  • To compare the reliability of the two systems.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 209 pelvic radiographs from 145 adult patients with osteoarthritic hips.
  • Two independent assessments by three experienced hip surgeons from different European countries.
  • Application of both Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems.
  • Calculation of inter- and intra-observer agreement using weighted kappa coefficients.

Main Results:

  • Both Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications demonstrated substantial to almost perfect reliability.
  • Interobserver reliability (kappa values) ranged from 0.85 to 0.93.
  • Intra-observer reliability (kappa values) ranged from 0.80 to 0.95.
  • High agreement was observed for both serial measurements by individual readers and between different readers.

Conclusions:

  • The Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems are reliable tools for assessing adult hip osteoarthritis.
  • Both systems provide consistent results among experienced surgeons.
  • The choice between systems may depend on the specific clinical information required, as they offer dissimilar data.

Related Concept Videos

Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The long...