Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Prevalent occupational exposures and risk of lung cancer among women: Results from the application of the Canadian Job-Exposure Matrix (CANJEM) to a combined set of ten case-control studies.

American journal of industrial medicine·2024

Same author

Lung Cancer in Ever- and Never-Smokers: Findings from Multi-Population GWAS Studies.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2024

Same author

Candidate pathway analysis of surfactant proteins identifies CTSH and SFTA2 that influences lung cancer risk.

Human molecular genetics·2023

Same author

Mosaic Chromosomal Alterations Are Associated With Increased Lung Cancer Risk: Insight From the INTEGRAL-ILCCO Cohort Analysis.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2023

Same author

Discussion of "A formal causal interpretation of the case-crossover design" by Zach Shahn, Miguel A. Hernan, and James M. Robins.

Biometrics·2022

Same author

Autoimmune conditions and pancreatic cancer risk in older American adults.

International journal of cancer·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

On combining family and case-control studies.

Ruth M Pfeiffer¹, David Pee, Maria T Landi

¹National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7244, USA. pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov

Genetic Epidemiology

|May 6, 2008

Summary

Combining family and case-control study data enhances the power to detect genetic associations with diseases. Novel statistical methods accommodate sampling schemes and familial correlations for improved genetic linkage analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Genetics
Biostatistics
Epidemiology

Background:

Genetic association studies are crucial for understanding disease etiology.
Family-based and population-based studies offer complementary insights.
Combining diverse study designs can increase statistical power for genetic discovery.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop statistical methods for integrating family-based and case-control genetic data.
To improve the power of detecting genetic associations by leveraging combined datasets.
To account for complex sampling designs and familial correlations in genetic analyses.

Main Methods:

Proposed two statistical approaches for data integration.
Method 1: Family as sampling unit with mixed-effects models and conditional likelihood.
Method 2: Individual as sampling unit using two-phase sampling and variance adjustments.

Main Results:

Both proposed methods effectively combine case-control and family study data.
Simulations demonstrated the comparative performance of the two approaches.
Illustrative analysis on melanoma and MC1R gene in an Italian population.

Conclusions:

Integrated analysis of family and case-control data offers a powerful strategy for genetic association studies.
The developed statistical frameworks provide robust tools for handling complex genetic datasets.
These methods enhance the ability to identify genetic variants influencing disease risk.