Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: a cautionary note.

Xue Wang1, Yonghong Chen, Mingzhou Ding

  • 1J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Neuroimage
|May 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Attention Control to Stimulus Selection: Neural Mechanisms Revealed by Multivariate Pattern and Functional Connectivity Analyses.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Rhythmic sampling and competition of target and distractor representations in visual sensory memory.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

The Ventral Attention Network Mediates Attentional Reorienting to Cross-Modal Expectancy Violations: Evidence from EEG and fMRI.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Neural Mechanisms of Willed Attention Control.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Neural representation of emotional valence in human amygdala and surrounding regions.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Is there a ubiquitous spectrolaminar motif of local field potential power across primate neocortex?

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Lifespan Trajectories of the Brain's Functional Complexity Characterized by Multiscale Sample Entropy.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Pleasant fragrance modulates dyadic social sharing of positive emotion: Sharer-centered socioemotional enhancement effect and its neural couplings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Altered Functional Hierarchical and Sequential Organization in Individuals with Schizophrenia during Auditory Processing.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Mechanical Deformation Explains Distinct Neuroimaging Patterns and Etiologies in Brain Trauma.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Ventral striatum temporal interference brain stimulation enhances the reward-positivity event-related potential and reduces anxiety.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

NeuroHarm‑Kit: An Open‑Source Toolbox for Benchmarking Deep‑Learning Harmonization of Multi‑Site T1‑Weighted MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Understanding brain processing of sensory input for goal-oriented behavior requires advanced methods. This study highlights pitfalls in current Granger causality analysis of brain activity, emphasizing single-trial analysis for accurate results.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • The brain's processing of sensory input to guide behavior is complex.
  • Multivariate recordings (LFP, EEG) and statistical methods like Granger causality are used to study neural information flow.
  • Current methods often analyze ongoing brain activity after removing average event-related potentials (AERPs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy of Granger causality analysis in event-related paradigms.
  • To identify limitations of current methods that remove AERPs.
  • To highlight the importance of single-trial analysis for understanding neural communication.

Main Methods:

  • Application of Granger causality to multivariate population recordings (LFP/EEG).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of ongoing brain activity after removing the average event-related potential (AERP).
  • Numerical simulations and experimental data to illustrate methodological pitfalls.
  • Emphasis on single-trial analysis of event-related potentials.

    • Main Results:

    • The removal of AERPs can lead to inaccuracies in Granger causality measures.
    • Trial-to-trial variability in event-related potential amplitudes and latencies significantly impacts interdependency measures.
    • Simulations and experimental data confirm the pitfalls of the standard approach.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard Granger causality analysis on ongoing brain activity (post-AERP removal) is problematic for event-related paradigms.
    • Single-trial analysis of event-related potentials is crucial for accurate assessment of stimulus-elicited information transaction.
    • Accurate understanding of neural processing requires accounting for trial-by-trial variability.