Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The case for common reference intervals.

Graham R D Jones1, Antony Barker, Jill Tate

  • 1Department of Chemical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. gjones@stvincents.com.au

The Clinical Biochemist. Reviews
|May 7, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An improved approach to modelling patient reclassification: HbA<sub>1c</sub> as an example.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Result harmonization in medical laboratories: accomplishments and challenges.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Cardiometabolic Biomarkers and Prediction of Kidney Disease Progression: The eGFR Cohort Study.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2025
Same author

Aligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicine.

EClinicalMedicine·2025
Same author

Outcome-based analytical performance specifications: current status and future challenges.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2024
Same author

Applying the Milan models to setting analytical performance specifications - considering all the information.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2024
Same journal

The Emerging Role of Copeptin.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2022
Same journal

The Role of PINP in Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Bone Disease.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2021
Same journal

Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2020
Same journal

Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Insulin Autoantibody-Mediated Glycaemic Dysregulation and Hyperinsulinaemic Hypoglycaemia: Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome and Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2020
Same journal

Considerations for Group Testing: A Practical Approach for the Clinical Laboratory.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2020
Same journal

Serum Marker Panels for Predicting Liver Fibrosis - An Update.

The Clinical biochemist. Reviews·2020
See all related articles

Laboratories should adopt common pathology reference intervals across Australia and New Zealand. This standardization improves healthcare integration and reduces costs, benefiting the medical community.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Pathology
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Current pathology reference intervals are laboratory-specific, leading to inconsistencies.
  • This fragmented approach hinders the integration of electronic health information.
  • Existing methods are often poorly executed and costly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for the adoption of common reference intervals in pathology.
  • To promote standardized reporting formats and assay standardization.
  • To address the challenges of modern healthcare with unified pathology data.

Main Methods:

  • This study presents a conceptual argument and proposes a shift in practice.
  • It emphasizes the need for collaboration across laboratories in Australia and New Zealand.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The focus is on the feasibility and benefits of standardization.

    • Main Results:

    • Implementing common reference intervals offers a more effective approach than current practices.
    • Standardization can lead to improved data integration and potentially reduced costs.
    • A unified system better serves the evolving needs of the medical community.

    Conclusions:

    • A move towards common pathology reference intervals is essential for modern healthcare.
    • Standardization is technically achievable and crucial for the pathology profession.
    • Failure to standardize represents a missed opportunity to meet contemporary health challenges.