Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Task coordination between and within sensory modalities: effects on distraction.

Muriele Brand-D'Abrescia1, Nilli Lavie

  • 1University College London, London, England.

Perception & Psychophysics
|May 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased neural responsiveness to distractors irrespective of perceptual load explains attention deficit in post-stroke fatigue.

Journal of neuropsychology·2025
Same author

Sustained selective attention in adolescence: Cognitive development and predictors of distractibility at school.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2023
Same author

Establishing gaze markers of perceptual load during multi-target visual search.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2023
Same author

Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual load.

Progress in neurobiology·2022
Same author

Perceptual load and enumeration: Distractor interference depends on subitizing capacity.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2021
Same author

Faces are not always special for attention: Effects of response-relevance and identity.

Vision research·2021
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Task coordination impacts distraction. Combining visual and auditory tasks increases distraction more than visual-only tasks, especially with difficult visual tasks, supporting load theory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Distraction and task coordination are key in understanding cognitive load.
  • Load theory proposes that increased executive control load enhances distractor interference.
  • Sensory modality (vision, hearing) plays a role in how tasks interact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test load theory predictions on task coordination effects on distraction.
  • To compare distraction in between-modality (vision-hearing) versus within-modality (vision-vision) tasks.
  • To examine the influence of task difficulty on distraction within sensory modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual flanker task under single-task and dual-task conditions.
  • Dual-task conditions involved coordination with either an auditory or a visual discrimination task.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

  • Response competition effects were measured to quantify distraction.

    • Main Results:

    • Between-modality coordination (vision-hearing) significantly increased distraction compared to single-task conditions.
    • Within-modality coordination (vision-vision) increased distraction only when the visual task was difficult.
    • Findings support load theory, showing greater distractor interference with higher executive control load.

    Conclusions:

    • Task modality significantly influences the effects of task coordination on distraction.
    • Executive control load, as predicted by load theory, is a critical factor in distractor interference.
    • The interaction between task difficulty and modality highlights the complexity of cognitive resource allocation.