Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an Ecosystem?01:17

What is an Ecosystem?

Overview
Freshwater Microbial Ecology01:24

Freshwater Microbial Ecology

Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic systems...
Osmoregulation in Fishes02:32

Osmoregulation in Fishes

When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?
Primary Production01:06

Primary Production

The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
Microbial Wastewater Treatment01:30

Microbial Wastewater Treatment

Microbial communities in aquatic ecosystems play a key role in the natural breakdown of contaminants introduced through domestic and industrial effluents. Acting as biological catalysts, these microbes change and mineralize a wide range of organic and inorganic pollutants under different redox conditions.In oxygen-rich surface waters, aerobic heterotrophs lead organic matter breakdown, using oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor to efficiently oxidize substrates to carbon dioxide and water.
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources02:03

Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources

The xylem of vascular plants distributes water and dissolved minerals that are taken up by the roots to the rest of the plant. The cells that transport xylem sap are dead upon maturity, and the movement of xylem sap is a passive process.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aphid honeydew reduces soil nitrogen and increases host plant growth.

Oecologia·2026
Same authorSame journal

Trapped honey bees reduce floral visitation on milkweed flowers.

Ecology·2026
Same author

Microscale temperatures affect the incidence and implications of predator-avoidance behavior in monarch caterpillars.

Oecologia·2025
Same author

Live fast, die young? Day- and night-warming affect the growth, survivorship, and behavior of caterpillars in the field.

Ecology·2025
Same author

Diet and methyl mercury contamination of nestling red-winged blackbirds.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025
Same author

Predator-driven behavioural shifts in a common lizard shape resource-flow from marine to terrestrial ecosystems.

Ecology letters·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Comparing resource pulses in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

Weston H Nowlin1, Michael J Vanni, Louie H Yang

  • 1Department of Biology, Texas State University, Aquatic Station, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA. wn11@txstate.edu

Ecology
|May 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Resource pulses impact ecosystems differently. Aquatic food webs respond faster to these pulses, while terrestrial systems show mixed results on pulse persistence, highlighting the need for further research.

More Related Videos

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Resource pulses significantly influence ecosystem productivity and dynamics across diverse environments.
  • Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems exhibit distinct food web structures and biogeochemistry, potentially leading to varied responses to resource pulses.
  • Comparative studies on ecosystem-type specific responses to resource pulses are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify similarities and differences in the causes and consequences of resource pulses in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
  • To investigate how differing food web and ecosystem structures influence ecosystem responses to resource pulses.
  • To test predictions regarding the speed of bottom-up effects and the persistence of impacts from resource pulses.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review comparing resource pulse responses across ecosystem types.
  • Analysis of predictions based on organismal growth rates, life history, stoichiometry, and consumer effects.
  • Case study examining the synchronous emergence of periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.) in eastern North American forests, affecting both terrestrial and aquatic systems.

Main Results:

  • Evidence generally supports the prediction that resource pulse effects transmit more rapidly through aquatic food webs.
  • Support for the prediction that resource pulse impacts persist longer in terrestrial systems is equivocal.
  • The periodical cicada emergence served as a model for studying cross-ecosystem pulse effects.

Conclusions:

  • Resource pulse transmission speed differs between aquatic and terrestrial systems, with faster transmission in aquatic environments.
  • The long-term persistence of resource pulse impacts in terrestrial ecosystems requires further investigation.
  • Elucidating indirect effects and long-term implications of resource pulses in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is crucial for ecological understanding.