Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Investigations on the Ga(III) Complex of EOB-DTPA and Its 68Ga Radiolabeled Analogue
Published on: August 17, 2016
Ga3+ as a mechanistic probe in Fe3+ transport: characterization of Ga3+ interaction with FbpA
Katherine D Weaver1, Jared J Heymann, Arnav Mehta
1Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0346, USA.
Abstract:
The obligate human pathogens Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and N. meningitidis utilize a highly conserved, three-protein ATP-binding cassette transporter (FbpABC) to shuttle free Fe(3+) from the periplasm and across the cytoplasmic membrane. The periplasmic binding protein, ferric binding protein (FbpA), is capable of transporting other trivalent cations, including Ga(3+), which, unlike Fe(3+), is not redox-active. Because of a similar size and charge as Fe(3+), Ga(3+) is widely used as a non-redox-active Fe(3+) substitute for studying metal complexation in proteins and bacterial populations. The investigations reported here elucidate the similarities and differences in FbpA sequestration of Ga(3+) and Fe(3+), focusing on metal selectivity and the resulting transport function. The thermodynamic binding constant for Ga(3+) complexed with FbpA at pH 6.5, in 50 mM 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid, 200 mM KCl, 5 mM KH(2)PO(4) was determined by UV-difference spectroscopy as log K'eff=13.7+/-0.6. This represents a 10(5)-fold weaker binding relative to Fe(3+) at identical conditions. The unfolding/refolding behavior of Ga(3+) and Fe(3+) holo-FbpA were also studied using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy technique, stability of unpurified proteins from rates of H/D exchange (SUPREX). This analysis indicates significant differences between Fe(3+) and Ga(3+) sequestration with regard to protein folding behavior. A series of kinetic experiments established the lability of the Ga(3+)FbpA-PO(4) assembly, and the similarities/differences of stepwise loading of Fe(3+) into apo- or Ga(3+)-loaded FbpA. These biophysical characterization data are used to interpret FbpA-mediated Ga(3+) transport and toxicity in cell culture studies.
Insights
Ferric binding protein A (FbpA) binds Ga(3+) 10(5)-fold weaker than Fe(3+), impacting transport and protein folding. These findings clarify FbpA
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Biochemistry
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Obligate human pathogens utilize the FbpABC transporter for Fe(3+) uptake.
- Ferric binding protein A (FbpA) binds Fe(3+) and can also bind Ga(3+).
- Ga(3+) serves as a non-redox-active substitute for Fe(3+) in studying metal-protein interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate similarities and differences in FbpA's sequestration of Ga(3+) versus Fe(3+).
- To investigate the impact of Ga(3+) and Fe(3+) binding on FbpA's transport function and protein stability.
- To correlate biophysical characterization data with FbpA-mediated Ga(3+) transport and toxicity.
Main Methods:
- UV-difference spectroscopy to determine thermodynamic binding constants.
- Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) coupled with H/D exchange (SUPREX) to assess protein folding.
- Kinetic experiments to study metal loading and complex lability.
Main Results:
- Ga(3+) binds to FbpA with a log K'eff of 13.7 ± 0.6, which is 10(5)-fold weaker than Fe(3+).
- Significant differences in protein folding behavior were observed between Ga(3+)- and Fe(3+)-bound FbpA.
- The Ga(3+)FbpA-PO(4) complex demonstrated lability, and stepwise metal loading kinetics differed between apo- and Ga(3+)-loaded FbpA.
Conclusions:
- FbpA exhibits distinct binding affinities and affects protein stability differently for Ga(3+) compared to Fe(3+).
- The weaker binding and altered folding of Ga(3+)-FbpA influence its transport function and cellular toxicity.
- Understanding these metal-specific interactions is crucial for studying bacterial iron transport mechanisms.
![Automated Preparation of [68Ga]Ga-3BP-3940 on a Synthesis Module for PET Imaging of the Tumor Microenvironment](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F68356.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
