Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dissociable interference-control processes in perception and memory.

Derek Evan Nee1, John Jonides

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. dnee@umich.edu

Psychological Science
|May 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physiological Evidence for the Time-dependent Resolution of Response Conflicts.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Precision fMRI reveals densely interdigitated network patches with conserved motifs in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Joint Cognitive Models Reveal Sources of Robust Individual Differences in Conflict Processing.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Delayed goal-directed processing underlies inhibitory control challenges in adult ADHD.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

PupEyes: An interactive Python library for eye movement data processing.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Evidence for Abstract Codes in Parietal Cortex Guiding Prospective Working Memory.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Retributive Sentiments Track Both Deterrent and Compensatory Concerns in a Small-Scale Society and a WEIRD Sample.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Cognitive control mechanisms for negative priming and proactive interference involve distinct brain regions, specifically occipital and left prefrontal cortex, respectively. However, some shared control processes are evident in right prefrontal and parietal areas.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Human Brain Function

Background:

  • Interference control is crucial for cognitive function, with research focusing on mechanisms filtering distracting perceptions (negative priming) and resolving intrusive memories (proactive interference).
  • Existing theories debate whether a single episodic retrieval process underlies both negative priming and proactive interference resolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms differentiating and unifying negative priming and proactive interference.
  • To test theories proposing a single versus multiple underlying processes for interference control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a single experimental paradigm combining negative priming and proactive interference.
  • Analyzed brain activation patterns associated with each type of interference and their overlap.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Occipital cortex activation was uniquely associated with negative priming.
  • Left lateral prefrontal cortex activation was uniquely associated with proactive interference.
  • Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and parietal regions showed common activation for both phenomena.

Conclusions:

  • The distinct regional activations contradict theories relying on a single process for both negative priming and proactive interference.
  • Shared recruitment of right prefrontal and parietal regions suggests some common control processes exist for managing cognitive interference.