Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ranking hospital performance based on individual indicators: can we increase reliability by creating composite indicators?

BMC medical research methodology·2019

Same author

Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Ontario, Canada.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2019

Same author

Incidence and Risk Factors of Keratinocyte Carcinoma After First Solid Organ Transplant in Ontario, Canada.

JAMA dermatology·2019

Same author

Days Alive and Out of Hospital: Validation of a Patient-centered Outcome for Perioperative Medicine.

Anesthesiology·2019

Same author

Derivation and External Validation of a Scoring System for Predicting Fracture Risk After Ischemic Stroke in a Canadian Cohort.

JAMA neurology·2019

Same author

Importance of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Prognosis of Patients With Heart Failure.

JACC. Heart failure·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.

Peter C Austin¹

¹Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada. peter.austin@ices.on.ca

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|May 13, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Propensity score matching offers less bias for relative risk estimation compared to stratification. Stratification provides greater precision, highlighting a trade-off in statistical performance for these methods.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Statistical Modeling

Background:

The propensity score represents the probability of treatment assignment based on observed covariates.
Conditioning on the propensity score can lead to unbiased estimation of treatment effects.
The performance of propensity score methods for relative risk estimation remains understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the performance of propensity score matching and stratification for estimating relative risks.
To compare bias and precision of different propensity score methodologies.

Main Methods:

Monte Carlo simulations were employed to assess propensity score matching, stratification, and covariate adjustment.
The study focused on estimating relative risks using these propensity score techniques.

Main Results:

Propensity score matching and stratification yielded similar mean squared errors for relative risk estimates.
Matching demonstrated reduced bias, while stratification offered increased precision.
Models including only true confounders or outcome-associated variables in the propensity score calculation resulted in lower mean squared error.

Conclusions:

Propensity score matching provides less biased relative risk estimates than quintile stratification.
Quintile stratification of the propensity score yields more precise estimates.
The choice between matching and stratification depends on the desired balance between bias and precision in relative risk estimation.