Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Topography and severity of coronary artery disease in white-coat hypertension
Dimitrios Kostandonis1, Vassilios Papadopoulos, Savvas Toumanidis
1Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Division of Medicine, Athens University at Alexandra Hospital, GR 11527 Athens, Greece.
Insights
White-coat hypertension (WCH) is linked to more severe coronary artery disease. Ultrasound of the heart and carotid arteries may help assess this risk in WCH patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- White-coat hypertension (WCH) is a known cardiovascular disease risk factor.
- Its role in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requires further investigation.
- This study evaluates WCH in a cohort undergoing coronary angiography and non-invasive imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with and without white-coat hypertension.
- To determine if non-invasive ultrasound techniques can aid in evaluating coronary artery disease in WCH patients.
Main Methods:
- One hundred patients with suspected CAD underwent coronary angiography, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and myocardial/carotid ultrasound.
- Coronary lesions were quantified using the Gensini score (GS).
- Patients were categorized into WCH and non-WCH groups based on blood pressure measurements.
Main Results:
- The Gensini score was significantly higher in the WCH group (P=0.042), particularly due to left anterior descending (LAD) lesions (P=0.007).
- In the WCH group, GS correlated with left ventricular dimensions (LVEDD, LVESD, EDV, ESV), LvMass/BSA, and carotid intima-media thickness (RICA, LICA, MICA).
- These correlations were not observed in normotensive patients.
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery disease may be more severe in patients with white-coat hypertension.
- Myocardial and carotid ultrasound data may assist in estimating coronary artery disease severity within the WCH population.
Background:
White-coat hypertension (WCH) has been evaluated as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In this study, the role of WCH is evaluated in a cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease with both coronary angiography and non-invasive techniques.
Methods:
One hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent coronary angiography, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and ultrasound imaging of the myocardium and carotids. The lesions in percentage of stenosis in the left coronary artery stem (LM), left anterior descending ramus (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), diagonal artery (D1), and right coronary artery (RCA), along with the Gensini score (GS), were recorded. After a series of manual blood pressure measurements, the patients were divided into two groups (patients with and patients without WCH).
Results:
GS was higher in the WCH group (P=0.042), a difference that could be attributed to lesions in the LAD (P=0.007). GS correlated significantly with left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD - P=0.041), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD - P=0.005), end-diastolic volume (EDV - P=0.042), end-systolic volume (ESV - P=0.004), LvMass/BSA (P=0.012), right internal carotid artery intima-media thickness (RICA - P=0.018), left internal carotid artery intima-media thickness (LICA - P=0.021), and their mean (MICA - P=0.005) in the WCH group but not in normotensives.
Conclusions:
Coronary disease may be more severe among patients with WCH than among those without. In this group, data from myocardial and carotid ultrasound may help to estimate coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
