Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable device therapy
Ilan Goldenberg1, Arthur J Moss
1Cardiology Division of the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA. ilan.goldenberg@heart.rochester.edu
Insights
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improve survival for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and heart failure. However, uncertainties remain regarding specific patient groups and device efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major cause of mortality, often linked to coronary heart disease and cardiomyopathy.
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have become crucial in managing cardiac conditions.
Observation:
- Randomized trials demonstrate significant survival benefits from ICD therapy in preventing SCD.
- Device therapy, including ICDs, CRT, and CRT-D, is increasingly used for both primary and secondary prevention of SCD and heart failure.
Findings:
- While ICD and CRT therapies offer substantial benefits, their efficacy varies in specific patient subgroups, particularly those with low ejection fraction.
- Potential risks include increased heart failure incidence and device malfunctions, despite technological advancements.
Implications:
- Further research is needed to refine clinical indications for implantable device therapy.
- Optimizing patient selection and device performance is crucial for maximizing therapeutic benefits and minimizing risks.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for two-thirds of fatal events related to heart disease. Coronary heart disease and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy are the most common causes of SCD. Data from major randomized trials have consistently shown that therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) results in a significant and meaningful effect on survival through a reduction in the risk of SCD in these population. These data have resulted in a marked increase in the application of implantable device therapy in the past 2 decades from secondary prevention with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) in survivors of a cardiac arrest to primary prevention of SCD in asymptomatic patients with ischemic and non-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, and prevention of symptomatic heart failure progression and death with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and devices that combine CRT and ICD therapies (CRT-D). However, there are still areas of uncertainty regarding device therapy that include inconsistent benefit in risk-subgroups of patients with low ejection fraction; increased risk of heart failure after life-prolonging ICD therapy, and a considerable rate of device malfunction despite increasing sophistication. In the present review we focus on current data regarding the clinical indications as well as the safety and efficacy of implantable device therapy, including ICD, CRT, and CRT-D.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Gene Therapy
Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

