Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

Perception

Perception

Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

Subconsciousness and No Awareness

Subconsciousness and No Awareness

The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Long-term Observational Study of the Longevity, Clinical Quality, and Periodontal Health Impact of Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses.

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2025

Same author

Long-term tooth discoloration induced by apical plugs with hydraulic calcium silicate-based cements in bovine teeth with open apices - a 6-year in-vitro study.

Clinical oral investigations·2025

Same author

Long-term Survival Rate and Clinical Quality of Individually Layered Indirect Composite Restorations in Adolescents and Young Adults.

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2024

Same author

Long-term performance of ceramic in/-onlays vs. cast gold partial crowns - a retrospective clinical study.

Clinical oral investigations·2024

Same author

Nicotine insensitivity and cue-controlled smoking behavior in people with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2023

Same author

Qualitatively Different Delay-Dependent Working Memory Distortions in People With Schizophrenia and Healthy Control Participants.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Divided versus selective attention: evidence for common processing mechanisms.

Britta Hahn¹, Frank A Wolkenberg, Thomas J Ross

¹NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse-IRP, Neuroimaging Research Branch, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. britta.hahn@gmail.com

|May 16, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study found no unique brain mechanisms for divided attention compared to selective attention. Brain activity in divided attention tasks reflects processing demands, not distinct functions.

More Related Videos

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroimaging

Background:

Distinguishing brain mechanisms for selective versus divided attention is crucial for understanding cognitive control.
Previous research often shows increased activity for divided attention, but rarely exceeding the sum of component tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether distinct neural mechanisms underlie divided attention compared to selective attention.
To determine if divided attention recruits unique brain activity beyond additive processing demands.

Main Methods:

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was used in healthy participants performing a selective-divided attention paradigm.
Performance accuracy was equated across tasks by adjusting stimulus display time.
Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signals were analyzed using whole-brain and region-specific comparisons.

Main Results:

No brain region showed significantly greater activation or deactivation during divided attention than the sum of the two selective attention tasks.
Regional brain activity correlated with task processing demands, as indicated by reaction times.
A left cerebellar region showed a positive correlation between BOLD signal and reaction time specifically during divided attention.

Conclusions:

The findings do not support the existence of brain activity uniquely specific to divided attention.
Increased brain activity during divided attention appears to reflect additive processing demands rather than qualitatively different neural processes.
Neural processes for divided attention seem to overlap significantly with those of selective attention.