Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Checks and balances: the welcomed tension between philosophy and science
Jamie Carlin Watson1, Robert Arp
1Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA. JWO5G@FSU.EDU
Abstract:
There is a tension between science and philosophy, but this tension need not engender enmity or derision. Scientists and philosophers can work together, and we argue that working together is beneficial to both, even if it is sometimes uncomfortable. We offer examples of how philosophy can autonomously and effectively inform scientific practice. Science and philosophy share certain methodological concerns and practices; therefore, scientists who disregard philosophy are vulnerable to critical conceptual mistakes. If our arguments are correct, and if it can also be shown that science informs philosophy, then, while it is possible for both disciplines to operate autonomously, each should welcome the checks and balances that each provides for one another in the investigation and explanation of reality.
Related Concept Videos
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Scientific Laws and Theories

