Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal inference and digital twins: a roadmap for the future of clinical trials.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Using Off-Treatment Sequential Multiple Imputation for Binary Outcomes to Address Intercurrent Events Handled by a Treatment Policy Strategy.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Spatio-temporal trends and socio-environmental determinants of suicides in England (2002-2022): an ecological population-based study.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

Genetic vulnerability and adverse mental health outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of CENTER-TBI and TRACK-TBI cohorts.

EClinicalMedicine·2024
Same author

Bayesian blockwise inference for joint models of longitudinal and multistate data with application to longitudinal multimorbidity analysis.

Statistical methods in medical research·2024
Same author

Exploring Synaptic Pathways in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Phenotype Genomics Approach.

Journal of neurotrauma·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.

Sara Geneletti1, Sylvia Richardson, Nicky Best

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK. s.geneletti@imperial.ac.uk

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|May 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method to adjust for selection bias in retrospective case-control studies. The approach uses a "bias breaking" variable to improve the accuracy of odds ratio estimates, enhancing epidemiological research validity.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health Research

Background:

  • Retrospective case-control studies are prone to selection bias due to differing recruitment processes for cases and controls.
  • Selection bias occurs when study selection criteria correlate with the risk factor of interest, compromising population representativeness.
  • Ensuring exchangeability between cases and controls is crucial but often challenging in practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel method for adjusting odds ratio estimates in the presence of selection bias in case-control studies.
  • To introduce the concept of a 'bias breaking' variable to mitigate selection bias.
  • To assess the performance of the proposed method through simulations and a real-world case-control study.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a bias-adjustment method for odds ratios based on identifying a 'bias breaking' variable.
  • This variable must effectively separate the risk factor from the selection criteria.
  • Required obtaining data for a bias-corrected estimate of the bias breaking variable's distribution.

Main Results:

  • Simulations demonstrated that the bias-adjusted odds ratio estimates were consistently closer to the true odds ratio than standard logistic regression estimates.
  • The 'bias breaking' variable approach proved effective in epidemiological settings.
  • Application to a case-control study confirmed the method's utility in detecting and addressing selection bias.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method provides a robust way to obtain bias-adjusted odds ratio estimates in retrospective case-control studies.
  • It aids in identifying and quantifying selection bias, thereby strengthening the validity of epidemiological findings.
  • This technique enhances the reliability of conclusions drawn from case-control research when selection bias is a concern.