Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Global motion processing: The effect of spatial scale and eccentricity.

Robert F Hess1, Craig Aaen-Stockdale

  • 1McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Quebec, Canada. robert.hess@mcgill.ca

Journal of Vision
|May 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why social media research has failed policy-makers.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

The amblyopic acuity deficit: Identification of letters distorted by spatial scrambling algorithms.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Development of a novel dichoptic reading tool to improve vision in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Dynamic Stereopsis Is Abnormal in Treated Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

Monocular eye-cueing shifts eye balance in amblyopia.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Amblyopic binocular imbalance quantified by the dichoptic contrast ordering test and dichoptic letters test.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Global translational motion sensitivity is best at mid-high spatial frequencies and declines at low frequencies. Peripheral vision

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Perception science

Background:

  • Understanding how the human visual system processes global motion is crucial for explaining visual perception.
  • Previous research indicates variations in visual sensitivity across the visual field and with spatial frequency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between global translational motion sensitivity, spatial frequency, and visual field eccentricity.
  • To determine if observed differences in peripheral motion sensitivity are due to early visual processing or higher-level computations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized DC-balanced, spatially narrowband elements (radial log Gabors) for local motion stimuli.
  • Matched stimuli across eccentricities by multiples above contrast threshold.
  • Measured global translational motion sensitivity across different spatial frequencies and visual field locations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Global translational motion sensitivity peaks at mid-high spatial frequencies and is lowest at low spatial frequencies.
  • Reduced sensitivity in peripheral vision is attributable to differences in spatial scale and contrast at early visual processing stages.
  • The efficiency of global motion computation in extrastriate cortical areas appears consistent across the visual field.

Conclusions:

  • The visual system's efficiency in computing global translational motion is largely independent of visual field location.
  • Peripheral visual deficits in global motion perception stem from earlier sensory transduction, not higher-level cortical processing.
  • Findings may not extend to other types of global motion, such as radial motion, due to known visual field anisotropies.