Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
Environmental heterogeneity generates fluctuating selection on a secondary sexual trait
Matthew R Robinson1, Jill G Pilkington2, Tim H Clutton-Brock3
1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom; Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom.
Resource allocation to reproduction can impact survival. In Soay sheep, male horn growth favored reproduction in good conditions but reduced survival in poor conditions, demonstrating fluctuating selection.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Behavioral ecology
- Population genetics
Background:
- Resource allocation trade-offs between reproduction and survival are critical in limiting environments.
- Sexually selected traits involve a balance between fecundity and viability, influenced by environmental conditions.
- Environmental heterogeneity can lead to varying optimal strategies for reproduction versus survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how ecological conditions influence the opposing selection pressures on a secondary sexual trait.
- To examine the relationship between male horn growth and lifetime reproductive success in fluctuating environments.
- To understand the role of fluctuating selection in maintaining genetic variation in sexual traits.
Main Methods:
- Studied a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries).
- Analyzed phenotypic and genetic associations between male horn growth and lifetime reproductive success.
- Assessed the impact of varying environmental conditions (good vs. poor) on these associations.
Main Results:
- Selection on male horn growth acted in opposing directions for viability and fecundity.
- The relative strength of these selection pressures varied with environmental conditions, causing fluctuating selection.
- In good environments, horn growth positively correlated with reproductive success; in poor environments, it negatively correlated due to reduced survival.
Conclusions:
- Fluctuating selection, driven by environmental conditions, impacts the balance between reproduction and survival.
- High investment in early sexual trait development (horn growth) is a gamble in unpredictable environments.
- Fluctuating selection may prevent the loss of genetic variance in secondary sexual traits.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Frequency-dependent Selection
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Mate Choice
Genetic Drift
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

