Opposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames

Area of Science:

• Agricultural Biotechnology
• Genetic Engineering
• Food Science

Background:

• Genetic engineering has led to accepted innovations in medicine.
• Public perception and a 'cognitive divide' have hindered agricultural biotechnology adoption.
• The 'genetically modified organism' (GMO) label is biologically imprecise yet influential in opposition.

Approach:

• Analyzes the impact of the 'GMO' framing on public perception and technology diffusion.
• Examines the biological coherence of the 'GMO' concept.
• Proposes disaggregating the 'GMO' concept to address misconceptions.

Key Points:

• The 'GMO' frame, despite lacking biological precision, has effectively mobilized opposition to agricultural biotechnology.
• Misconceptions surrounding agricultural biotechnology limit its potential, particularly in developing nations.
• Overcoming these misconceptions is crucial for leveraging biotechnology to address global development and environmental challenges.

Conclusions:

• Disaggregating the concept of 'genetically modified organisms' is essential for overcoming public misconceptions.
• Addressing these misconceptions will enable wider adoption of beneficial agricultural biotechnology.
• This is particularly important for developing nations facing significant development and environmental challenges.