Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

11:25
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
Sign iconicity and receptive vocabulary testing
1Department of Psychology, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA.
American Annals of the Deaf
|May 21, 2008
Summary
This study explored sign vocabulary tests, finding deaf students performed better than hearing students. Sign iconicity impacts test results, highlighting the need for careful test development for deaf learners.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Educational Psychology
- Deaf Studies
Background:
- Developing valid receptive sign vocabulary tests is crucial for assessing language acquisition in deaf individuals.
- The influence of sign iconicity, the visual resemblance between a sign and its referent, on test performance requires further investigation.
- Existing vocabulary tests may not be suitable for deaf signers due to potential iconicity biases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the development of valid receptive sign vocabulary tests.
- To examine the impact of sign iconicity on test performance in both deaf and hearing participants.
- To provide recommendations for creating more accurate sign vocabulary assessments.
Main Methods:
- Adapted 40 items from the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R).
- Developed three distractor items per target item to mitigate perceptual matching strategies in nonsigning participants.
- Administered tests to 34 deaf signing undergraduates and 36 hearing nonsigning undergraduates.
Main Results:
- Deaf students significantly outperformed hearing students on both original and manipulated sign vocabulary items.
- Hearing students scored higher on original items than manipulated items, suggesting inherent iconicity.
- Both groups exceeded chance levels, indicating that many items possessed some degree of iconicity.
Conclusions:
- Sign iconicity can influence vocabulary test performance, even in sophisticated participants.
- Complete elimination of iconicity in sign tests is challenging.
- Involving nonsigning hearing participants in test development can help reduce iconicity effects and improve validity for deaf signers.
