Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of Income Inequality and Women's Intrasexual Competition.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Improving patient understanding of prenatal screening tests: Using naturally sampled frequencies, pictures, and accounting for individual differences.

PEC innovation·2023
Same author

Sex, and other important things: Tracking ratios of ecologically significant categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022
Same author

Simulating human behavioral changes in livestock production systems during an epidemic: The case of the US beef cattle industry.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Impact of truck contamination and information sharing on foot-and-mouth disease spreading in beef cattle production systems.

PloS one·2020
Same author

"Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations": Correction to Buss et al. (2020).

Journal of personality and social psychology·2020
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning.

Gary L Brase1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA. gbrase@ksu.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Presenting statistical information as natural frequencies, rather than chances, significantly improves reasoning performance. Participants who interpreted chances as frequencies also showed better statistical reasoning skills.

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Human Reasoning

Background:

  • Statistical reasoning is crucial for decision-making.
  • Natural frequencies are hypothesized to be a cognitively privileged format for statistical information.
  • Prior research suggests numbers presented as chances also facilitate performance, challenging the frequency hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether natural frequencies or chances phrasing leads to better statistical reasoning performance.
  • To explore the role of participant interpretation (chances as frequencies vs. probabilities) in statistical reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • A series of experiments were conducted presenting statistical information using natural frequencies and chances phrasing.
  • Participant interpretations of chances phrasing were assessed.
  • Statistical reasoning performance was measured across different presentation formats and participant populations.

Main Results:

  • Performance in statistical reasoning tasks was significantly improved by clearly presented natural frequencies compared to chances phrasing.
  • Participants who interpreted chances as frequencies, rather than probabilities, demonstrated consistently better statistical reasoning.
  • These findings held across variations in information presentation and diverse participant groups.

Conclusions:

  • Natural frequencies appear to be a more effective format for statistical reasoning than chances phrasing.
  • Participant interpretation of numerical information plays a critical role in statistical reasoning effectiveness.
  • The results support the notion that how information is framed and understood impacts cognitive performance in statistical tasks.