Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ruminative self-focus and negative affect: an experience sampling study.

Nicholas J Moberly1, Edward R Watkins

  • 1Mood Disorder Center, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology
|May 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

University student mental health research: look back to move forward.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

A parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a culturally adapted, rumination-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (RFCBT) guided self-help targeting repetitive negative thoughts in Japanese female university students - study protocol for the RESUME-CBT trial.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Caregiver-Child Co-Rumination and Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Rumination-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.

Journal of depression and therapy·2025
Same author

Repetitive negative thinking in daily life predicts psychopathology: Further validation of an ecological momentary assessment paradigm.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Identifying the active ingredients of cognitive-behavioural therapy: Conceptualisation, methods and evidence.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Brief use of behavioral activation features predicts benefits of self-help app on depression symptoms: Secondary analysis of a selective prevention trial in young people.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2025
Same journal

Applying hierarchical bayesian modeling to experimental psychopathology data: An introduction and tutorial.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
Same journal

Higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in a neurodevelopmental transdiagnostic sample.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
Same journal

Decreased reward-related brain function prospectively predicts increased substance use.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
Same journal

Context matters: Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with increased disordered eating and earlier activation of genetic influences in girls.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
Same journal

Satiety does not alter the ventral striatum's response to immediate reward in bulimia nervosa.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
Same journal

Network models of posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2021
See all related articles

This study found that ruminative self-focus and negative affect influence each other over time. Brooding, a type of rumination, was linked to increased negative affect.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Affective Science

Background:

  • Rumination is a known risk factor for psychological distress.
  • Previous research suggests rumination exacerbates negative affect.
  • The precise temporal dynamics between self-focused rumination and negative affect require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between momentary ruminative self-focus and negative affect.
  • To investigate the reciprocal influence between these two constructs.
  • To differentiate the roles of brooding and reflective pondering in negative affect.

Main Methods:

  • An experience sampling methodology was employed.
  • Ninety-three adults participated, recording ruminative self-focus and negative affect eight times daily for one week.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Questionnaire measures of dispositional rumination were also administered.

    • Main Results:

    • Dispositional rumination correlated with mean levels of momentary ruminative self-focus.
    • Momentary ruminative self-focus was positively associated with concurrent negative affect.
    • Cross-lagged analyses indicated a reciprocal relationship: ruminative self-focus predicted subsequent negative affect, and negative affect predicted subsequent ruminative self-focus.
    • Brooding, specifically, was associated with higher negative affect, unlike reflective pondering.

    Conclusions:

    • A reciprocal, bidirectional relationship exists between ruminative self-focus and negative affect.
    • These findings extend Nolen-Hoeksema's response styles theory by highlighting the dynamic interplay.
    • Interventions targeting brooding may be crucial for mitigating negative affect.