Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

06:53
Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
Published on: June 8, 2019
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
Elisabeth M A Boormans1, Erwin Birnie, Hajo I Wildschut
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.m.boormans@amc.nl
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
|May 22, 2008
Summary
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) may replace traditional karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. This study compares MLPA and karyotyping for diagnostic accuracy, quality of life, and costs in pregnant women.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Prenatal Diagnostics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Traditional karyotyping (TKT) has been the standard for prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aberrations for 30 years.
- TKT is accurate but labor-intensive, with long turnaround times (14-21 days), high costs, and potential for incidental findings.
- Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is an emerging molecular genetic technique for prenatal diagnosis, with preclinical data suggesting comparable performance to TKT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether MLPA can serve as a substitute for TKT in prenatal diagnosis.
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy, maternal quality of life, patient preferences, and costs associated with MLPA versus TKT.
- To provide comprehensive data for deciding on MLPA's potential replacement of TKT in low-risk pregnancies.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter diagnostic substitute study involving pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis.
- Both MLPA and TKT will be performed on amniotic fluid samples from approximately 4500 women.
- Primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes include maternal quality of life, women's preferences, and costs. Analysis will follow intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles.
Main Results:
- This section is to be filled once the study is completed and results are available.
Conclusions:
- The study is expected to determine if MLPA can replace TKT for prenatal diagnosis in low-risk pregnancies.
- Results will inform clinical practice regarding diagnostic accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and economic factors.
- This research represents the first clinical study to assess all relevant aspects of MLPA as a TKT replacement.
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...
Karyotyping
Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

