Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Occlusion as an Adequate Preconditioning Stimulus to Induce Early Ischemic Tolerance to Focal Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: May 9, 2013
Combined surgical approach to carotid and coronary artery disease
Cristijan Bulat1, Igor Alfirević, Zvonimir Ante Korda
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Special Hospital for Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology Magdalena, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia. cristijan.bulat@zg.htnet.hr
Insights
Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CEA/CABG) is safe and effective. Both cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump techniques showed no significant differences in neurological events or mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Coexistent carotid and coronary artery disease presents a complex surgical challenge.
- Combined procedures aim to address both conditions simultaneously, but optimal technique remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CEA/CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) versus off-pump techniques.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-five patients with severe carotid and coronary artery disease underwent combined CEA/CABG.
- Patients were divided into two groups: one with CPB (arrested heart) and one off-pump (beating heart).
- Outcomes including perioperative neurological events, mortality, and myocardial infarction were assessed.
Main Results:
- No transient or permanent perioperative neurological events occurred in either group.
- Early mortality was 5.6% and perioperative myocardial infarction was 5.5% across both groups.
- No late strokes were observed during the follow-up period.
Conclusions:
- Combined CEA/CABG is a safe and effective procedure for patients with severe, coexistent carotid and coronary artery disease.
- Both CPB and off-pump techniques demonstrate comparable safety profiles regarding neurological and cardiac outcomes.
- The choice between CPB and off-pump may not significantly impact early or late outcomes in this combined procedure.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare two different surgical approaches to patients with coexistent significant carotid and coronary artery obstruction. Patients were treated with combined operation of carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CEA/CABG). The first group of patients underwent the CABG procedure with the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on arrested heart and the second group without the CPB on a beating heart--off pump. Between May 15 1998, and October 9 2003, thirty-five consecutive patients underwent the combined procedure. In both groups there were no cases of transient or permanent perioperative neurological events. Overall, early mortality was 5.6%. The incidence of a perioperative myocardial infarction was 5.5%. In the follow-up period there were no cases of late stroke. According to the presented results in this study, it was found that the combined CEA and CABG is an equally safe and effective procedure performed with or without cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with a severe coexistent carotid and coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management