Related Experiment Videos
GALA: an international multicentre randomised trial comparing general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for
Michael J Gough1, Andrew Bodenham, Michael Horrocks
1Vascular Surgical Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. michael.gough@leedsth.nhs.uk
Insights
This randomized trial compared local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. It found that anesthesia type impacts peri-operative outcomes and stroke-free survival in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Atherosclerosis-induced internal carotid artery stenosis poses a high risk of ischemic stroke.
- Carotid endarterectomy improves outcomes, especially after transient ischemic attack or mild stroke.
- Surgical complications, including fatal stroke, can occur, prompting investigation into safer anesthesia methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if local anesthesia is safer than general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.
- To compare peri-operative morbidity and mortality between local and general anesthesia.
- To evaluate the impact of anesthesia type on quality of life and long-term stroke-free survival.
Main Methods:
- A two-arm, parallel group, multicenter randomized controlled trial targeting 5000 patients.
- Patients suitable for either anesthesia type, with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, were eligible.
- Primary outcome: proportion of patients alive, stroke-free, and without myocardial infarction at 30 days post-surgery.
Main Results:
- The study aimed to recruit 5000 patients for a comprehensive comparison.
- Key outcomes included 30-day and one-year stroke-free survival, quality of life, and adverse events.
- Secondary analyses focused on re-operation rates, costs, and hospital stay duration.
Conclusions:
- The trial will provide critical data on the safety and efficacy of local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.
- Findings will guide clinical decision-making to optimize patient outcomes and reduce peri-operative risks.
- This research addresses a significant question in vascular surgery regarding anesthesia choice for carotid stenosis treatment.
Background:
Patients who have severe narrowing at or near the origin of the internal carotid artery as a result of atherosclerosis have a high risk of ischaemic stroke ipsilateral to the arterial lesion. Previous trials have shown that carotid endarterectomy improves long-term outcomes, particularly when performed soon after a prior transient ischaemic attack or mild ischaemic stroke. However, complications may occur during or soon after surgery, the most serious of which is stroke, which can be fatal. It has been suggested that performing the operation under local anaesthesia, rather than general anaesthesia, may be safer. Therefore, a prospective, randomised trial of local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy was proposed to determine whether type of anaesthesia influences peri-operative morbidity and mortality, quality of life and longer term outcome in terms of stroke-free survival.
Methods/Design:
A two-arm, parallel group, multicentre randomised controlled trial with a recruitment target of 5000 patients. For entry into the study, in the opinion of the responsible clinician, the patient requiring an endarterectomy must be suitable for either local or general anaesthesia, and have no clear indication for either type. All patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic internal carotid stenosis for whom open surgery is advised are eligible. There is no upper age limit. Exclusion criteria are: no informed consent; definite preference for local or general anaesthetic by the clinician or patient; patient unlikely to be able to co-operate with awake testing during local anaesthesia; patient requiring simultaneous bilateral carotid endarterectomy; carotid endarterectomy combined with another operation such as coronary bypass surgery; and, the patient has been randomised into the trial previously. Patients are randomised to local or general anaesthesia by the central trial office. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients alive, stroke free (including retinal infarction) and without myocardial infarction 30 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients alive and stroke free at one year; health related quality of life at 30 days; surgical adverse events, re-operation and re-admission rates; the relative cost of the two methods of anaesthesia; length of stay and intensive and high dependency bed occupancy.
Trial Registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00525237.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Stages of General Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship