Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: a comparison of the Bentall and valve-sparing procedures
Nishant D Patel1, Eric S Weiss, Diane E Alejo
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background:
We compared results of the Bentall procedure with valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) for aortic root aneurysm in Marfan syndrome.
Methods:
Marfan syndrome patients who had the Bentall procedure or VSRR at our institution between April 1997 and September 2006 were identified. Follow-up information was obtained from hospital charts and contact with patients or their physicians. Kaplan-Meier survival and propensity score analyses were performed.
Results:
One hundred forty Marfan syndrome patients had either the Bentall procedure (n = 56) or VSRR (n = 84; 40 remodeling and 44 reimplantation). Bentall patients were older than VSRR patients (38 versus 29 years; p = 0.0001) and had more aortic dissections (16% versus 1%; p = 0.0012); more urgent/emergent surgery (20% versus 2%; p = 0.0008); larger preoperative sinus diameter (5.7 versus 5.1 cm; p = 0.0004); and more preoperative 3+/4+ aortic insufficiency (59% versus 10%; p < 0.0001). There were no operative deaths. Postoperatively, 9% Bentall patients (5 of 56) and 1% of VSRR patients (1 of 84) suffered thromboembolic events (p = 0.03). Two percent (1 of 56) of Bentall patients required reoperation on the aortic root versus 6% of VSRR patients (5 of 84; p = 0.40). Eight-year freedom from aortic valve replacement was 90% for VSRR patients. Eight-year survival was 90% for Bentall and 100% for VSRR patients (p = 0.01). Propensity-adjusted regression showed that the Bentall procedure did not predict mortality (p = 1.00) and did not protect from reoperation (odds ratio = 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 4.33; p = 0.36).
Conclusions:
The Bentall procedure and VSRR have similar operative results in Marfan syndrome. The procedures are distinguished by higher rates of thromboembolism among Bentall patients and higher rates of reoperation among VSRR patients. Lower late survival among Bentall patients probably reflects the preferential use of the Bentall procedure for higher risk patients.
Insights
The Bentall procedure and valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) show similar early outcomes for Marfan syndrome patients. Bentall surgery had more thromboembolism, while VSRR had more reoperations and lower late survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Genetics
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Marfan syndrome is a genetic disorder affecting connective tissue, often leading to aortic root aneurysm.
- Surgical repair of the aortic root is crucial for Marfan syndrome patients to prevent catastrophic aortic events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of the Bentall procedure versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) in patients with Marfan syndrome and aortic root aneurysm.
- To evaluate operative results, survival rates, and reoperation rates between the two surgical techniques.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of Marfan syndrome patients who underwent either the Bentall procedure or VSRR between 1997 and 2006.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and propensity score analysis were employed to compare outcomes.
- Follow-up data were collected from hospital records and patient/physician contact.
Main Results:
- 140 Marfan syndrome patients were analyzed: 56 underwent the Bentall procedure and 84 underwent VSRR.
- Bentall patients were older and presented with more complex aortic conditions, including dissections and severe aortic insufficiency.
- Postoperative thromboembolic events were higher in the Bentall group (9% vs 1%), while VSRR had a higher reoperation rate (6% vs 2%). Eight-year survival was 90% for Bentall and 100% for VSRR.
Conclusions:
- Both the Bentall procedure and VSRR demonstrate comparable early operative results in Marfan syndrome.
- Key differences include a higher incidence of thromboembolism with the Bentall procedure and a greater need for reoperation with VSRR.
- The lower late survival observed in the Bentall group likely stems from its application in higher-risk patient cohorts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm I: Introduction

